Hi all on Talk Photography - It's Matthew here from Ag Photographic / Ag Photolab. I don't get a huge amount of time to post on forums, but we do read them and there are some points I want to address, which I hope you will find helpful. Firstly, thank you very much for the orders and business that you have sent us.
Turnaround
I know turnaround is not quick, and I know that there are faster labs out there (although we generally dispatch dev only C41 and B&W within 24 hours of receipt). However, my position when we started offering the lab services was that we had to get the quality and value for money right first - then speed. (I know some quality issues have been raised in this thread, and I'll address those below). Pointless of turning around quickly if the discerning customer (and virtually all film users are very discerning, understandably) is disappointed with the results. I'm an avid photographer and film user myself, and have been for many years both for personal and professional capacity. The problem we have is this - we have a lot of volume of work in the lab at all times and we are at capacity. Capacity of the lab relies of two things - equipment and, most importantly, people suitably experienced in operating the equipment. It takes a lot of experience to get the sort of print / scan balance consistency required for a proper professionally run photographic lab. Nick Howse, our lab manager and main printer, has been correcting and balancing photographs for 25 years, it's all he has ever done. Many people who used to work in photographic labs have either retired (in Birmingham 20 years ago, there were about 15 labs, now there are 2) or taken different careers. So we intend to expand our capacity as soon as we possibly can - I'm currently getting prices in on another Noritsu and I think we can improve it a lot.
Quality issues
There are reports of scratches in this thread. As I mentioned above, I am an avid film user and I use and have used a plethora of different cameras over the years. Here is an unarguable fact: Film cameras sometimes scratch films, regardless of the condition of the camera and regardless of what has happened with previous films. It's by far and away the most likely cause of a mark on films. With the best will in the world, grit and other abrasives will get into cameras and cause problems. So sometimes you will get a scratch on a film and the next film.....you don't. It's not the lab (or at least extremely unlikely). Someone above is complaining that we scratched the film, but Ilford didn't on the next film. Guess what - we have people call us here and tell us, "Oh 'X' Lab scratched my film" "I dont think they are a very good lab" - we are thinking, well, they probably didn't scratch it. So what I would say is:
Any customer is welcome to turn up at our premises, any time, unannounced, and see how we handle, and how the equipment handles, you film. I have absolutely no problem with that.
Although, it's best if you do call first and so I can make sure I'm here to give you a tour and explain how the equipment works. I think then, it would be clear that.
srichards - I am confident we did not scratch your film - I can't see any report to us by you of your concerns on our emails or system. Please contact me and I will arrange processing of 3 films free of charge with high res scans.
Glenn - your film was lost by Royal Mail as we had the wrong address. You know we had the wrong address because you moved house and we still had your old address. Your forwarding did not work. It's unfortunate, but true. We have no interest in trying to cover up a mistake - my policy is to hold our hands up if something does go wrong as, in my experience, this works to our favour in the end.
Finally, a quick comment on the two samples posted by FujiLove. Main difference with the two is we have given it more density - in the end personal preference plays a part. Interestingly, when scanning motion picture film it's normal for the director of photography to attend the transfer and tell the colourist how he wants it - we did think about offering "attended scans", might appeal to some people, but it would just slow things down more and I don't think it would be cost effective!