As long as you're fine having a company spy on you in your own home, they're fine.
Personally, I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole. I don't want Amazon listening to my private conversations.
Buy an Anker Bluetooth speaker instead!
Well, at the link it concludes that “they are only listening when a keyword is spoken” haha! How do they hear the keyword if they are not listening?worth a read if that's what puts you off purchasing one
https://www.techworld.com/security/does-amazon-alexa-listen-to-my-conversations-3661967/
Well, at the link it concludes that “they are only listening when a keyword is spoken” haha! How do they hear the keyword if they are not listening?
The google home mini had a privacy issue so google disabled the top touch mechanism permantly.
https://www.cnet.com/news/google-du...ch-function-over-privacy/#ftag=CAD-00-10aag7d
Regarding privacy smart phones have a similar functionality and even include GPS that pin points your movements too so probably potentially a worst privacy issue.
One problem I’ve come across is the unit going off due to bloody Christmas adverts that feature the voice command!!
Worth noting that the 3rd gen has a pin type power adapter.
I only know as I just got one and unboxed 15 min ago and it is different to the 2nd gen thst I have which has a mini usb. I was hoping to power it from a USB hub I have.
As for sound, mine is connected to an Anker blue tooth speaker and for my (let's be honest the kids) needs is perfectly adequate. I don't think that our lugs are as finely tuned as many others.
£25 at the moment so relatively inexpensive
I have a 2nd gen, bought it last year on black fri. Personally, I think its poor as a speaker imo. I only use it to stream music, originally to a bluetooth speaker but now to my JAM wifi speaker. Saves me getting the phone out to stream spotify, just ask alexa to do it.I was thinking of getting one for my stepdaughter for Xmas and wondering what the speaker quality was like and general overall impression.
She would use.it to stream music off her phone and Spotify with Bluetooth.
it's not rocket science. The device is listening locally for a specific word "Alexa". Only after that does it record or process any phrases, whilst the halo light is flashing. It is NOT sending any data anywhere without that wake word.Well, at the link it concludes that “they are only listening when a keyword is spoken” haha! How do they hear the keyword if they are not listening?
Well, that’s what they say happens ...it's not rocket science. The device is listening locally for a specific word "Alexa". Only after that does it record or process any phrases, whilst the halo light is flashing. It is NOT sending any data anywhere without that wake word.
And how many times have you heard "That word" on the TV or radio?Well, that’s what they say happens ...
And do you remember all those kid’s toys that were recording their voices (and all around them no doubt) and were sending them back to a China “to improve the service”And how many times have you heard "That word" on the TV or radio?
(or is it trained to ignore voices other than yours )
Its a generation thing, I was having a similar conversation a little while back with my 20 something year old son.And do you remember all those kid’s toys that were recording their voices (and all around them no doubt) and were sending them back to a China “to improve the service”
I watched the BBC TV production of 1984 in 1954 (Peter Cushing as Winston Smith) and I can remember that the only really unlikely thing about it was that there might be cameras in the TV sets and so on watching everybody. I used to read a lot of science fiction and was well practised at “believing” improbable things but interconnected cameras and microphones was just a bridge to far for me but as you can see from some of the responses most people nowadays think Big Brother is wonderful, as they did in the bookIts a generation thing, I was having a similar conversation a little while back with my 20 something year old son.
They have been bought up with all this "stuff" he / they see no problem with it, and just accept it as the norm.
"1984" was a tad late arriving, but it has.
yes, you can change it to echo and also computer (for the trekkies apparently, my missus was chuffed when she discovered that). Not sure if they have added more now as it was last christmas we got oursCan you change the wake word on them?
yes, you can change it to echo and also computer (for the trekkies apparently, my missus was chuffed when she discovered that). Not sure if they have added more now as it was last christmas we got ours
Do you have to train them to the new word because if so it would be just like those impossible (for me anyway) security questions, where you can write any gobbledegook as answers, so you could choose “computer” but pronounce it feckoff or whatever?I'd want to choose something completely different not just out of a pre determined list.
Do you have to train them to the new word because if so it would be just like those impossible (for me anyway) security questions, where you can write any gobbledegook as answers, so you could choose “computer” but pronounce it feckoff or whatever?
It's what does happen. You can get paranoid if you like, but it's not based in realityWell, that’s what they say happens ...
It's what does happen. You can get paranoid if you like, but it's not based in reality
So have the recent events with courts in the US requiring Amazon/Google to hand over recordings of ambient conversations that may have been recorded during murders just stupid people asking the impossible?
Priceless or perhaps matchless would be more appropriate
Yes. You'll note that if you read the details there's no examples of recordings existing other than post wake weir
"Wake word" was what I meant to type. This is how the DSPs on these devices work, they do not send all audio and as you surmise this is easily proven with wireshark or similar. It just doesn't happen.Did you mean to write more? I have no details about whether recording exist or not, and if Google & Amazon are telling the truth about how the devices work (a few seconds of audio that constantly refreshes, stored locally) then it would be easy enough to tell if they were sending back speech simply by observing network traffic during an extended conversation in the presence of the device. TBH my expectation is that the devices don't send back all audio data as yet, simply because of the outcry it would cause, but that as acceptance of voice control becomes more common, so eventually all audio will be recorded and retained for use.
We've got three Echo Spots, lounge, kitchen and bedroom. They are ideal for listening to the news and talk radio type content, also a brilliant device for a glorified alarm clock. Music quality wise though they are a bit thin and uninspiring.
For Spotify, a Sonos Play:1 is a much better bet. They don't support bluetooth though.
That's why mine isn't connected to the Internet, except when I need it to be.you do realise that, your mobile phone can be used as a remote microphone as well
Rumour has it, they already doYou'll probably also find that 'smart' tv's will also be able to listen to you in the future as well.
And has been for longer than people care to admit to themselvesbig brother is indeed watching
That's why mine isn't connected to the Internet, except when I need it to be.