It might be time to start snapping up (sorry) all those interesting old LF lenses without shutters that pop up on the well known auction site.
For the DIY poor and needy is there anyway that you can use old projector lenses for LF....h'mm thinking projectors and lenses were usually for 35mm slides so might not work?????
It might be time to start snapping up (sorry) all those interesting old LF lenses without shutters that pop up on the well known auction site.
I've got a big brass lens which it would be nice to attach a shutter to.
Before I begin to make massive savings (on estate duty ) by snapping up enough barrel lenses to keep Diogenes in a home for the rest of his life, may I ask what's the projected )) cost of the shutter so I know how much to offset against the savings?
That including the friends, family and enablers discount?
Possibly a daft question, and one that I fully appreciate someone may have asked previously, but have you thought about incorporating a basic light meter into the design? I know this is scope_creep_101, but would be awesome
Honestly, given the shutter has a seperate box, I'd be inclined to put a small incident meter in the shutter frame and send the reading to the control box. Even if you're spot metering its sometimes handy to have a second opinion so you can see if you've programmed the wrong ISO into one meter or the battery is away.
Personally I’d go without a built in meter and keep it simple but that’s coming from someone who wings his exposure times
Like many LF togs i use a slotted holder ( cokin P) which attaches to the front of the lens and accepts 84mm square filters .
Being able to use these with the shutter in place is by far more important ( to me) than having an additional ( to a handheld) metering system.
Possibly a daft question, and one that I fully appreciate someone may have asked previously, but have you thought about incorporating a basic light meter into the design? I know this is scope_creep_101, but would be awesome
Honestly, given the shutter has a seperate box, I'd be inclined to put a small incident meter in the shutter frame and send the reading to the control box. Even if you're spot metering its sometimes handy to have a second opinion so you can see if you've programmed the wrong ISO into one meter or the battery is away.
Like many LF togs i use a slotted holder ( cokin P) which attaches to the front of the lens and accepts 84mm square filters .
Being able to use these with the shutter in place is by far more important ( to me) than having an additional ( to a handheld) metering system.
Ok, I was chatting with Matt last night and he's going to send me the code from his meters so I can integrate it into my shutter controller code. The sensor itself is an off the shelf unit so I'll see about integrating one into the shutter housing, then connecting it to the remote unit.
I was thinking of having a few configuration options, which could be selected from the controller (after you specify the aperture/iso for the meter);
1) Manual shutter control, with a button to take a meter reading separately.
2) Fully automatic shutter speed selection from the meter reading.
Ok, I was chatting with Matt last night and he's going to send me the code from his meters so I can integrate it into my shutter controller code. The sensor itself is an off the shelf unit so I'll see about integrating one into the shutter housing, then connecting it to the remote unit.
I was thinking of having a few configuration options, which could be selected from the controller (after you specify the aperture/iso for the meter);
1) Manual shutter control, with a button to take a meter reading separately.
2) Fully automatic shutter speed selection from the meter reading.
Add in your digital waterhouse stops and you've got "A" mode for LF, folk will be lining up for this!
Auto Sheimpflug?
TAKE MY MONEY!
I'll be burned at the stake by the more traditionalist photographers though
To ensure that, shove a 5x4 digital sensor at the back end...
Well, given that "645" sensors are still much smaller than 60x45 mm and already cost a fortune, I suspect at 4x5 digital sensor would cost around the same as a small yacht! No, hang on, existing MF digital is already in that bracket, so perhaps a large yacht, though short of Ibramovitch scale...To ensure that, shove a 5x4 digital sensor at the back end...
TBH, the idea of a huge sensored digital camera rather appeals to me so the above post was only half in jest. I have a real problem with patience and have completely lost interest in a shot by the time it comes back from DP&S so being able to see the result instantly (or even within a few minutes) would let me into the world of LF.
Please note that this isn't a film v. digital post, I'd LOVE to have the patience back and shoot film again. I even have some small cards that only held 40 or so shots to keep me disciplined when shooting digital but they only fit my older compacts now (CF cards and most of my digitals now use SD.) I still have enough patience to set up a camera, just not to wait the length of time it would take a lab to get negs/slides/scans back to me.