D
Deleted member 97386
Guest
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes but I can't use even the Flickr image to post here as it will downsize the image, correct?
Ah. I just clicked on an image and instead of zooming in it took me to flickr. Is there a way to zoom into embedded images and not be taken off sight to the hosting site?The elephants look good.
I tend to post from Flickr at 1024px on the long side, but that allows for the image to be clicked to view larger on Flickr. 1600px wide images look great if you are browsing on a desktop, but not so much if you are on mobile.
Ah. I just clicked on an image and instead of zooming in it took me to flickr. Is there a way to zoom into embedded images and not be taken off sight to the hosting site?
In what way so much workseems so much extra work.
Fair point, I guess I/we were assuming file was already in flickr.So what I'm hearing is instead of uploading here you upload to Flickr and then when you paste the Flickr link here you have to click the image to see it larger on Flickr. Have I got that right?
Yes, then viewers can view the full res file ... doesn't seem like hard work to me.So what I'm hearing is instead of uploading here you upload to Flickr and then when you paste the Flickr link here you have to click the image to see it larger on Flickr. Have I got that right?
Yes, then viewers can view the full res file ... doesn't seem like hard work to me.
I think it depends on the max view size he sets.Can the poster set the file to open at a large size in Flickr or does it default to smaller size.?
The 'difficult' image situation I can sympathise with and though I have never entertained the thought of replacing a sky I do recall one safari image from 2005 when I shot all in jpeg so limited potential to "get better out of the image". Having said that you have prompted me to find it and have another go using the more modern PPing software.@Box Brownie I took a look and yes there was a linear gradient added to the sky to darken the top slightly and also one at the bottom to help draw the eye into the middle of the scene. The sky was replaced but there wasn’t anything I could think of to do about the shadow so I left it alone. I think In the future if I replace a sky in an image I’ll point that out initially to avoid confusion. Of all the images I took on that trip I think this is the only one that I fiddled with the sky. I saw some potential but couldn’t live with the dull gray sky.
I have agree with sky swaps on nature/wildlife images.First image is beautiful (and looks fine on my Mac screen).
Probably just me, but I struggle with the notion of 'replacing the sky' on a wildlife image.