I'm not. That's the entire point of every post I've put on this thread...Actually look at the data over a representative timescale, rather than just accepting the prevailing narrative. If the data showed we are up the proverbial creek without a paddle then I'd fully accept it. But it doesn't, and as with many topics these days, no challenge to the accepted position can be tolerated.
As I've previously mentioned, we're told climate change will lead to more extreme weather, more storms, more hurricanes. But the data shows nothing of the sort, it shows there are less of them now than in the pre-industrial era. Nowhere have I said the climate isn't changing. I've said it's not anything like the problem it's made out to be, and that position is supported by any data set you care to look at. It's different, but nothing out of the ordinary when looking at temperatures on geological timescales.
We have forest fires in Southern Europe at present, but is that unusual in the hottest, driest part of the year? No.
I'm sure at some point we'll have floods. But rivers have always flooded, it's a natural thing. What isn't is building lots of houses on flood plains. So climate change gets blamed for floods, which are inevitably described as devastating. But it's nothing to do with climate change, and everything to do with building things in the wrong place.
Ok. A reasonable post..unlike the one I referred to above.
When you say "look at the data over a representative time scale" it would be useful,as you've obviously looked, to present it here. I posted graphs of both emmisions and temperatures going back to the 1800s. I've done a bit of digging and,as you say there's no definitive evidence that global warming has caused more storms,hurricanes or any othe type of extreme weather but what scientists are agreed on is that these events are becoming more intense,more frequent and longer lasting. I read a paper by NOAA..National Oceonic and Atmospheric Administration. (US Government body) I expect you'll know that. Last updated this month.
"It is premature to conclude with high confidence that human-caused increasing greenhouse gases have had a detectable impact on past Atlantic basin hurricane activity, although they are strongly linked to global warming"
I'll just jump to your last sentence as that's the one that caught my attention most. It's here.
"So climate change gets blamed for floods, which are inevitably described as devastating. But it's nothing to do with climate change, and everything to do with building things in the wrong place"
First off we're not just talking about urban UK. Low lying countries in the less developed world are badly flooded..One of the most vulnerable being Bagladesh. That's down to rising sea levels caused by global warming in two ways. First, glaciers and ice sheets worldwide are melting and adding water to the ocean. Second, the volume of the ocean is expanding as the water warms. The flooding in Germany last July was caused by a severe storm and continuous rains that caused rivers and streams to swell up and flood the towns and cities located alongside the banks of the river Ahr .When the soil and the water bodies were no longer able to absorb the excess water, it spilled out in nearby areas causing catastrophic damage to towns.
I read this definition of floods. "Floods are described as sudden onset events where normally dry land is inundated with an overflow of accumulated water that it is unable to absorb.'
The mechanism is to be found in the fact that as climate change warms up the atmosphere the air can hold 7% more water vapour for every one-degree Celsius rise in temperature so when this air rapidly cools heavy rainfall follows causing floods. Since 1976 humans have increased the CO₂ concentration 27% from 330ppm to 420ppm by emitting 100 times more CO₂ than all the world's volcanoes combined. Without that one aspect in the greater scheme of the timeline of pollution then it's not unreasonable to assume (as a lay person in these matters ) that we wouldn't have had so many severe weather events.
I agree that building on flood plains is responsible for much flooding of houses and businesses but the floods (ie in rivers) in the first instance are increasingly being caused by climate change in the form of severe rain events. In fact,Tewkesbury..9 miles from where I live has been hit hard a couple of times due to flooding ..catastrophically in 2007 (as was Gloucester) because it's just downstream of where two rivers meet. The Severn floods days after heavy rainfall in the Welsh mountains .
I'll drop out of this debate,Richard. It's almost like arguing about what's in the Bible. The answer is that somewhere in it is the answer any individual wants to promote.
In the meantime ,as a storm fan..
I shall be very disappointed if, here in Gloucester, we don't see thunderstorms as this system breaks down from Tuesday night into Wednesday. We miss a lot of weather due to the Welsh hills.
An Edit after posting. I started this post before our evening meal and then got caught up with TV news. I returned,finished it ,posted it without thinking to check if there had been other posts. More participants in the discussion and a lot covered, I see.