Thank you!These look great. A lot of detail captured in the flowers and dogs.
I find it really good to be honest. Using a harness takes the weight off my neck and distributes it well. I find it comfortable to hold, even with my arthritis and have had no ill effects. My one criticism would be the exposure comp dial, which I find quite stiff but manageable - as long as I can remember the way to turn it instinctively! The manual doesn't make it easy to find certain settings, or how to use them, but I'm getting there!Very good Marcia. How do you find the handling, weight etc?
No trapped fingers as yet Glenn, but now you've mentioned it I suspect I'll soon be complaining about it!Sounds really positive. Have you trapped your fingers in the reversed lens hood when you switch it off yet? I think it is a great camera and am trying to sell all my other kit, so I'll just have this and the RX100 IV for travelling.
Nice Panos. Here are a few from this morning. It amazes me that this variety can be achieved without changing lenses:
[
Anyone know if any stock is available on this camera.. anywhere in the uk? Just about to go on holiday and it looks like a great choice. Many thanks
Thanks for the reply, it's not looking good getting one before I go away.Marcia got lucky by phoning around but no-one is admitting to having any stock and there's no date for stock coming back into the country.
Glen these are great! Share your thoughts on the variety - it's tantalisingly close to the photographer's dream of one camera to do it all
I'm waiting on the DL 24-500 whenever that may appear??
Wow - that's some rationalisation! I have a Fuji XT1 which I use with a UWA for landscape work - it's a great setup but I could see it being marginalised by the SonyThanks, this really is the 'do it all' camera as far as I'm concerned and I'm delighted to say has replaced all this, except I have an RX100 IV for light travelling. I'm considering keeping my Panasonic 7-14 and getting a GM1 for extreme wide angle.
Much later this year at best. The only area where it's likely to be better than the RX10 III is AF speed.I still think it's a bit expensive, but if it replaces all that........
I'm waiting on the DL 24-500 whenever that may appear??
It will equal in IQ , Nikon always been great at that, touch screen something amiss on the rx ( cop out Imo) and a dam site cheaper, AF better I'll take that to. Sony alway over price and overrated imoMuch later this year at best. The only area where it's likely to be better than the RX10 III is AF speed.
Well that's it each to their, it does take great pics and it's about you and what suits you, I'll still wait for Nikon as it's £500 cheaper, I don't think they'll change the price, they've lost enough alreadyI was originally going to wait for the Nikon too, but as it was originally delayed due to sensor problems I didn't want to be one of the first adopters when it came out. So that would have meant waiting till at least next year. I saw this thread, saw the stunning results, decided I liked the idea of a longer lens, and then wondered how much the Nikon would actually cost when it is eventually released what with the way the £ is going. Having been lucky enough to find one, I couldn't be happier with my decision. But then we're all different!
I apologise, as obviously I was only speculating as regards the price.Well that's it each to their, it does take great pics and it's about you and what suits you, I'll still wait for Nikon as it's £500 cheaper, I don't think they'll change the price, they've lost enough already
Nothing to apologise for, it's quite a difference. Hope it's worth waiting forI apologise, as obviously I was only speculating as regards the price.
Weird Artifacts in bokeh
Just looking through some pics from yesterday and spotted this:
Interesting,what are your thoughts.