It seems to me that the image includes a lot of things that often help, but are applied w/o specific intention. It feels like you're trying to do/accomplish too much.
You will often hear/read that a good landscape image should have fore/middle/back layers of interest. And you will see a lot of images that have some rocks or whatever in the FG like you did here. But in this case the rocks are just rocks... they're not particularly interesting, they're too small in the frame if there are details of interest there, they don't lead into the image (in fact they kind of block the flow), and they're too far to the periphery.
Then you have a lot of leading lines that lead the eye straight to the centered grey mountain, which is actually the area of least interest. All of the lines/details on the left side make it feel busy/heavy/unbalanced, and they contribute to the FG rocks feeling isolated/lost.
IMO, the best part of the scene is the right half and a different composition focused on that area could have worked much better, might have been able to use the rocks better, etc. Dave's edit helps IMO, but it's a bit of "a save" effort.
One of the biggest things I think one can do when you find an attractive scene is to stop and break it down... what exactly is it that attracts you to the scene? What's the most important element/aspect? And then focus on/compose around that aspect and leave out anything that doesn't contribute.