Just thought:- if a tripod is inconvenient (for low light) then maybe a monopod would be better than nothing.....to reduce camera shake.Well I found all the common 200\400 ISO films are good for low light and night time (well some light)..if you use a tripod. Could bore you with shots for examples.
Waiting to send off my Tesco 400 ISO films and Vista200 ISO film taken of the moon and fireworks (using a tripod)...erm should be interesting and will post if any good.
Don’t you have to do a special process to vision 3?No experience of it, but a quick Google throws up plenty of results: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fuji+c200+pushed+to+800&oq=fuji+c200+pushed
It looks grainy as all hell, so a 400 speed may be a better option.
I'd also try a roll of Kodak Vision 3 500T for low light. If you like it, bulk loading works out at something like £2.50 a roll.
http://www.twinlenslife.com/2010/12/in-bleak-midwinter-new-kodak-portra400.html
I’m surprised people say it looks awful,https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaster-petsai/34640861284 that’s at 800 and I think it looks pretty cool
Does anyone have any experience in pushing ether colour plus 200 or c200 to 800? Want to pick a colour film to shoot the majority of the time and I sometimes like to use it low light
if you like its look just use it, its irrelevant what anyone else thinks!I’m surprised people say it looks awful,https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaster-petsai/34640861284 that’s at 800 and I think it looks pretty cool
Because I was looking for a comparison, I’d rather buy one type in bulkif you like its look just use it, its irrelevant what anyone else thinks!
Don’t you have to do a special process to vision 3?
Because I was looking for a comparison, I’d rather buy one type in bulk