- Messages
- 286
- Name
- Damen
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi guys
ive been out today taking pictures of my son etc when im at 200mm f2.8 i cant help but notice how soft/not so sharp the image can be, even with a shutter speed of 320th
when i have my little sqaure on his face for focus i dont know if its just me but it appears his other parts of body look sharper than his face
3.5 is better and f4 is fine, but i got rid of my tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 for it for the f2.8
i notice aswel that my tamrons VC is alot more stabilised than my sigma lens, my lens does stablise but i wonder if thats down to the weight?
would they need calibrating?
ive been out today taking pictures of my son etc when im at 200mm f2.8 i cant help but notice how soft/not so sharp the image can be, even with a shutter speed of 320th
when i have my little sqaure on his face for focus i dont know if its just me but it appears his other parts of body look sharper than his face
3.5 is better and f4 is fine, but i got rid of my tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 for it for the f2.8
i notice aswel that my tamrons VC is alot more stabilised than my sigma lens, my lens does stablise but i wonder if thats down to the weight?
would they need calibrating?
Last edited: