All fat related to challenge #94, is to be chewed here...
and no spitting..
..and anything about Bristol and you might get a suspension.
That's it, game over, perfect, I won't be bothering now...
I saw @steveo_mcg 's great entry and immediately had a sense of deja vu, and then it hit me that we did "pairs" as a theme 2 years ago. I can't remember what I did at work two days ago, but I remember a random post off an internet forum from two years ago. Nice one brain!
OMG another Brian! @excalibur2
I can't cope wiv two of 'em
A bad memory gets annoying when you go into a room and say to yourself "what did I come in here for "
Anyway this pairs theme is not easy as either you have a pair or you don't...difficult to shoehorn.
I do that all the time Or, I think "oh I need to find out something", but by the time I've got Google up I've forgotten what I'm doing!
You could post a photo with four of something in, and call it a pair of pairs
Whats more embarrassing is my complete lack of imagination, I pulled the exact same image as last time...
Hark the keeper of the list approaches.
That's exactly how I found it, very useful thread that!
It won last time so why change it If my photo was that good then I'd be entering it again too haha
I didn't even remember the theme let alone it performance at its last outing.
H'mm either the mods have deleted my shot or I forgot to hit the post reply button
I had a look at my entry in that challenge, to see if I too had chosen the same image (no). The post is here... The interesting thing is not the post, or the image, but the "Proudly hosted by Ph*tobucket" watermark over it. I don't know yet whether this applies to all the old PB images that had become unavailable, but it's certainly a better outcome than their earlier "image unavailable" messages!
I only looked at the 1st post list, scrolled down to 1 and didn't notice it only goes to 42..
oh well, its a pair of pairs...
I can see how that would easily happen.
The list was structured badly really, so I've moved things about about a bit.
That's a very kind post, but I should have been paying more attention tbh.
Still, its a fine edit...