I have not used the 35mm in ages, even all the Xmas day photos and video were done with the kit lens. Most of my photos are either indoors or in the front and back garden. 35mm would be great if it were not for the crop.trying really hard to stop myself buying the 35mm
not necessarily,but sometimes it rocks my boatIs IQ everything? Discuss.
I have got some fabulous photos with the 35mm, but it is mostly of the family in the park etc. yes I have got a few indoor stuff as well, but mainly head and shoulders. Can get a little tricky getting full length photos indoors, nigh impossible in our tiny home.that one above was at 35mm,ive been using it at that focal length and I find it fine.
John any chance of taking some photos with both so if I can spot any IQ difference, no rush and only if you fancy the test otherwise chill
What are we discussing ?Is IQ everything? Discuss.
Ahh, but what do you have on the end of them?Blimey.. I don’t have a d3***....but we have a d3100 and d3400 in the house
its a nice lens but not too versatileThis was a quick snap using the 50mm of my neighbour when he wad gutting his house
next door.
image 2,easilyWhich of these is 'better'?
Hmmm, a difficult one. Very close, viewing on PC not sure. If on my large screen , I might see a difference.Which of these is 'better'?
OK, Image 1 was taken with the 35mm prime, Image 2 by the AF-P 18-55 VR. Not scientific, but ...........................
The 18-55 set at 35mm ?