they are both out of focus to me?The pics were taken a few hours apart so the light is different.
Not really a great deal in it really..Actually 34mm (although set on 35mm). I have cropped the images to roughly the same size.
I thought maybe the contrast had been tweaked in the second photo.The pics were taken a few hours apart so the light is different.
Sitting next to the missus right now, and grabbing the camera with the kit lens on and trying to get a photo of her. She is sitting and even at 18mm I still have to move back a little. I do like getting close when getting people photos, especially of the missus.
PS
I like getting all of her in frame, even her fingers and toes.
Too much food and chocolates etc, both of us tired. Probably have an early night, in fact shutting things down now.Put the camera down and get on with it
It is probably hiding from you, it probably wants a rest.looked for my credit card to order the 35mm,i cant fiiing find it lol
They say (" Angle of view is equivalent to that of a 27-82.5 mm lens in FX/35mm format "), I do prefer the wider end and I do like it set at 24mm most of the time.
they are both out of focus to me?
PS in another issue the 35mm only got 3 stars and no award
It is a strange lens the 35mm. Even at f/2.8 a photo of my dog and her face is in focus, while her body is defocused greatly. I have to go to f/5.6 or something, but then it is no longer a fast lens. So no point in shooting wide open, so may as well just use the kit lens.so what do you think image wise between the 35mm and the kit?
It is a strange lens the 35mm. Even at f/2.8 a photo of my dog and her face is in focus, while her body is defocused greatly. I have to go to f/5.6 or something, but then it is no longer a fast lens. So no point in shooting wide open, so may as well just use the kit lens.