- Messages
- 23,624
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
No I didn't look, no point. I have of course just done so now. As you say, not scientific but useful nonetheless. Looking at the EXIF I see the Robin was at 300mm vs 550mm for the CT, therefore I assume that the Robin was more heavily cropped which could explain why the CT looks more detailed? Also, heavier crops tend to show up noise more But nice to see what each is capable ofIf you haven't already looked The Robin is with the D750 and 300mm AFS F4 Prime @ ISO 2000 and the Coal Tit is with the D810 and Sigma 150-600mm @ ISO 1600. I just wanted to show how the D810 handles the noise for dark green colours which I find a pain sometimes. They have both cleaned up okay, but like you, I feel the CT has more pop to it. Nothing scientific but to just give you a rough idea.
Last edited: