Been shooting with the 24-120 over the weekend and I find it quite a mixed bag of results.
My copy is pretty good for a 5 x zoom and I do find the focal length quite versitile, but also I think it makes me quite lazy and looking back at some of the shots, my framing could have been better.
Having previously been using a 35/85 combo, I do find the 24-120 a much user friendly lens, but the overall results are not as good. I am not relying in the VR as I was shooting at quite fast speeds (moving child!).
This leads me to what I do about my friends wedding in Scotland come January and well, the 24-120 in general.
I was never happy shooting with the 35/85 combo. My favourite focal length is definatly the 50 (I know some people love the 35mm focal length, but thing its a personal thing).
So as another bout of GAS sets in I am thinking of trying out the 24mm f1.8g alongside the 50mm and maybe get ANOTHER 85mm f1.8g (or just not worry about the 85).
I know I would lose the 85-120 focal length and the zoom, but I do also have a 70-200.
Can someone please just tell me its a bad idea so I can get these thoughts way from my head!!
If I get a 24, I cant afford to keep the 24-120.
Thoughts, debate, opinions, banter....