Would you not be worried about the light reflection issue with floodlights just being out of shot at many games.Also how would you combat the 6.5 fps against 9/11 fps?Faster mate, blazing fast.
Lock on is faster and tracking better, in low light @ ISO 3200-12800 it kicks the ass of the D3S
I have also said that if for any reason i got back into shooting pro again i would but 2 x D750 before buying D3S's or D4's and i stand by that.
Would you not be worried about the light reflection issue with floodlights just being out of shot at many games.Also how would you combat the 6.5 fps against 9/11 fps?
Has the 750 got the standard 10 pin accessory plug on it?
Hmmmm.............doesn`t look like it.
Do they use the N3 connecter rather than the 10 pin Roger?No flash sync port or 10-pin connection.
Pretty sure it is the same as the D90 for instance, N3 connection.That I don't know Ade
The new body needs to be different to the D800 that I already have,smaller and lighter certainly appeals, better FPS does as well.I shoot one D800 and D610 which the D610 resolution matches that of the D750. For cropping down the D800 is comfortable better, 36mp vs 24mp. Whilst the D610 is no slouch and the RAWs usefully smaller 25mb vs 40mb the crop ability factor is great and you can still end up with a large enough file to print despite cropping heavily.
The D750 is a lighter camera over the D610 and that is a good bit lighter than D800. If you want something lighter to use, you may well find it great. I am a big fan of the 8x0 series and with cheap HD storage, I'd find it very hard NOT to go for the D810
Pretty sure it is the same as the D90 for instance, N3 connection.
The new body needs to be different to the D800 that I already have,smaller and lighter certainly appeals, better FPS does as well.
Not 100% sure yet, but the 750 is appealling.
I`ll nip to Calumet in the new year and handle them both, make a decision then.I think you've sold the body to yourself
Do they use the N3 connecter rather than the 10 pin Roger?
Has the 750 got the standard 10 pin accessory plug on it?
Hmmmm.............doesn`t look like it.
Done a few portraits today and shot a few hundred frames using group area AF. Very impressive, not a single out of focus frame using 35 / 85 1.4 combos. Also a lot of brightly backlit shots no issues at all. What a great camera! Does anyone know much about group area AF? Does it just prioritise AF to the centre of the group ?
Group AF was used for moving targets (obviously)
Just picked up my replacement earlier from srs in Watford, not panamoz prices but pretty good at £1675. Great little camera, pretty easy to deliberately replicate the shading 'feature' with a streetlight, but I really can't see this occurring when shooting normally.
Don't worry about it dude and enjoy the camera. I have yet to see a remotely usable photo that had the banding.
I really didn't like my D800 for BIF work, the D810 is a lot better in that respect (AF accuracy/tracking). There are several other little things that made the D810 upgrade worth it to me. But, I still use my D4 more often for wildlife due to the ISO performance and typical shooting conditions.... you loose the file size/cropability advantage of the D8xx by ISO 1600 (IMO).Appreciate the input Gary, I know you call a spade a spade, so your experience and comments certainly hold water.
I`m just going through my shots and seeing if any are near 1/4000th, not many are to be honest,so maybe I could live with that. @Blank_Canvas ,thanks for pointing it out though.
The other option is a D810,but not sure how much better it is than the D800 to be honest.
Decisions,decisions.......
Thanks Steve, i think the 750 is the way to go. The Mrs and I are doing weddings again now, so the smaller size will suit her better.I really didn't like my D800 for BIF work, the D810 is a lot better in that respect (AF accuracy/tracking). There are several other little things that made the D810 upgrade worth it to me. But, I still use my D4 more often for wildlife due to the ISO performance and typical shooting conditions.... you loose the file size/cropability advantage of the D8xx by ISO 1600 (IMO).
The D750 is a great balance of all of the factors... if I could only have one camera it would be the D750 at the moment.
AFAIK, the only difference between the Multi-CAM 3500FX II and the Multi-CAM 3500FX autofocus sensor modules is that the II is sensitive down to -3EV instead of -2EV. I *think* the -3EV is accomplished by having the sensor positioned closer/more shallow; which is what is contributing to the banding issue.see post above, D4S/D810 use 3500 MKI module, D750 uses improved D3500 MKII module
Hi all
So close to upgrading to one of these, from a D700. Just need to save up a few more pennies before pushing the Panamoz button.
Can I ask, how well built/sturdy is the flip screen? I would assume it could be one of the first things to go. I`m not particularly heavy handed, but don`t fancy something flimsy.
It's pretty solid, I shared your concerns, but now I have one I'm sure it will last.
Interesting news on Nikon rumours. www.nikonrumours.com this small issue is holding me back. It looks a fab camera, anyone used it in the studio, would love to see some portrait stuff.
Mine doesn't suffer from it and I'll be adding a second shortly.