- Messages
- 1,779
- Name
- Glenn
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Here's a couple of examples with the 75mm:
Yep shows just how sharp it is Glenn, I've just taken a couple of test shots to see how the bokeh shapes up and it is smooth. Off to North Wales next week so will give it a good run out then. Just ordered the JJC hood also. I think I'm going to like this lens a lot.
London Camera Exchange on the Strand had one that I got a good fondle of, as well as the Fuji jobbie. Very nice they were too.
Jessops on Oxford Street ... Camera World on Wells Street
This morning's moon with legacy Olympus OM Zuiko 300mm f4.5 and Olympus OM 2x teleconverter, hand-held
This morning's moon with legacy Olympus OM Zuiko 300mm f4.5 and Olympus OM 2x teleconverter, hand-held
That's rather better than I'd have expected with a 2x TC
Wow - great composition and amazing blue
That is fantastic
It's a programable function button that you can configure to do whatever you like.
Yes it does make it rather more quiet doesn't it.ShrubMonkey said:Upgraded to firmware 1.5, no more IBIS noise, can't believe how quiet it is
Panasonic 7-14mm at about 7 am today
lovely sunrise glenn - any sign of the dreaded purple fringing?
Thanks I always had a UV filter on my walkabout lens and the polarising one on my 10-20mm. Being only 52mm they are much cheaper than my 77mm ones.A CPL is completely different to a UV filter.
A UV filter serves no purpose on a digital camera other than the protect the lens. A CPL has an effect on polarised light, so will effect your shots (how much will depend on conditions at the time).
Know what a filter does before buying it!
-------------
EDIT: Sorry, just looked at your post history and see that you've previously owned a DSLR so must know all of the above already.
For me, lens protection is like extended warranties - an expensive solution to solve a rare problem. I use a CPL frequently, but for it's optical effects not for protection. I have a UV for protection in the camera bag, but I've never yet felt the need to use it. In a sandstorm, I'd probably put the camera away and hide!
No, you are right. Panasonic actually have stocks of original batteries you can buyThankfully Oly aren't like Panasonic when it comes to these things.
Is there a cheap equivelent of the canon 50mm 1.8 for the OMD?
Are there no left-eye OM-D shooters? :shake:Finally managed to get my hands on a demo E-M5 today (Jessops, New Oxford St).
Was very impressed - seems very solid despite the size without being overly heavy, and the EVF is nice and clear (the eyecup was missing but the EVF was still usable, unlike the NEX 7 I also tried).
The one downside was the placement of the rear dial - it's too close to the EVF as I'm a left-eye shooter and my face is in the way. I'd probably swap the wheels so that aperture was at the front and EC at the back, but it would still be annoying. And I think the grip only replicates the front wheel, rather than being programmable to replace the rear?
Are there any other left-eye shooters with an E-M5? How do you manage with it? I've seen there's a deeper eye-cup available which might give me more room between face and dial!
If you are comparing to a 50mm lens on an Canon APS-C sensor, the equivalent field of view on MFT is 40mm (50 x 1.6 / 2.0).
The nearest at the moment is the Olympus 45/f1.8.
There are. It's just your definition of cheap that needs adjustingUmm that seems to be quite expensive I thought there were great cheap lenses for the MFT cameras?
Anyone used either of these with their OM-D? What about with firmware 1.5?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/New-Batte...89?pt=UK_Camera_Batteries&hash=item20c900bb1d
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2PCS-2X-B...80?pt=UK_Camera_Batteries&hash=item41684e7f9c
Glenn Surtees said:Panasonic 7-14mm at about 7 am today