Completely agree with the pair of you... kicked myself when I saw the image! I was just like 'damn, bad framing!' haha
Yeah this was scanned backwards, shame really... This is the un-edited version... scanned and plonked it on here for feedback!
I've quoted you a couple of times here Jamie because I'm not really getting your 'thinking'.
You've put this image up for critique but you've essentially critiqued it yourself. The upper quote, you noted 'bad framing', I could understand you still putting it up as we could see beyond that but with the second quote, I feel you're not giving yourself the best chance of critique.
I'm not sure where people could go with critique because it's quite difficult to see beyond the unedited version.
My thinking when putting images up for critique is essentially that I've given it my best effort, framed/composed to my view, edited to get the look I want but then putting it out there for others to critique and perhaps notice something which I've overlooked.
To each their own though, I just feel that to get down to honest critique one needs to present their best effort.
Otherwise, I feel one could get bogged down in explaining perceived 'faults'. For example, the backwards scanning. Could this not have been rectified prior to posting. I'm not a film shooter so don't know how involved scanning is.
This is by no means having a go Jamie, just a few observations/thoughts. Please feel to ignore haha!