iced_jacob said:the problem is that they have chose to go for eos mount. that means there's a limit to how much you can decrease the size of the body (see pentax k-01). so, unless they suprise us in an extremely positive way, it looks like they are going to release a no-VF eos with much worse handling and no significant size decrease :/
I thought they have a new mount for it. hence the new 22km lens on the pictures. the sensor on it is a bit smaller then 650d
They can beat NEX by making some decent, reasonably priced lenses, especially primes. Releasing their CSC with just two lenses isn't a great start.
For all-round user experience (sensor, lens and body ergonomics) M43 and the OM-D in particular, is the one to beat.
Some moor images posted
I do not understand the reaction really.
If you have a number of lenses and a more advanced body.
I've tried a CSC without a VF and having to use the back screen all of the time just isn't for me.
The rumour sites did say that this first Canon CSC wouldn't be a high end model and that something else would be along later. All I can say is that if something better does come along it'll need to have a VF to get me to read further.
something innovative like the Olympus OMD EM5 with an integrated viewfinder.
Possibly EF and/or EF-S lenses fit directly. So you'd havehow would you already have a number of lenses, this camera uses a different mount doesn't it or is there a mount adaptor for EF, EF-S?
Possibly EF and/or EF-S lenses fit directly. So you'd have
full-frame: EF only
crop: EF or EF-S
CSC: EF, EF-S or EF-M
michael23 said:
Very much like the nex 18-55 isnt it. It's starting to grow on me.
I they release this with a small very high quality UWA this could be a nice landscape backup. On tripod LCD is fine, but not otherwise.
vrapan said:Ok sorry my bad, kinda assumed if it was using the same sized sensor it might be able to take existing lenses without an adaptor. If you need a new array of lenses I do not see why you would choose this over M43.