- Messages
- 7,505
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
WOW 4 pages and still most don't have a clue
4 pages and no one has mentioned the Scrivens word...
WOW 4 pages and still most don't have a clue
4 pages and no one has mentioned the Scrivens word...
Reference was made to him in post #73
Post 63 actuallyAh, I missed that
As someone who has been nominated at least twice so far, I certainly don't find it insulting or poor community spirit. Quite amusing really.I'm finding this thread rather distasteful. Let's all "guess" by identifying the person we think deserves a ban, ie the person we think is the nastiest, rudest, etc.
Is this really the kind of community spirit we want to foster?
not that i was nominated ,but it was just a bit of fun ,and i have had plenty aimed at me in the pastAs someone who has been nominated at least twice so far, I certainly don't find it insulting or poor community spirit. Quite amusing really.
Nope its still not himSo 5 letters liverpudlian name beginning with N ? Lol
Most people are trying to second guess the already banned member, and their reincarnation.I'm finding this thread rather distasteful. Let's all "guess" by identifying the person we think deserves a ban, ie the person we think is the nastiest, rudest, etc.
Is this really the kind of community spirit we want to foster?
As someone who has been nominated at least twice so far, I certainly don't find it insulting or poor community spirit. Quite amusing really.
not that i was nominated ,but it was just a bit of fun ,and i have had plenty aimed at me in the past
Only 3 or 4 timesDid somebody say Joe Scrivens ?
My old nemesis
Only 3 or 4 times
The cat is out the bag anyway post #173
As someone who has been nominated at least twice so far, I certainly don't find it insulting or poor community spirit. Quite amusing really.
It is obviously against the rules.First thought is do not do it.
The problem is Keith some try to come back with an aggressive contact us, not the way it works is it ?Secondly, depending on the seriousness of the initial ban, wait a respectable amount of time then eat some humble pie,
Again the problem with that is, people are warned several times before they get a ban, unless of course its a spammer.apologise for the actions that saw you banned
I don't fancy either of yours.Maybe it depends on the nurse?
View attachment 106019
You could make it 10 times, I don't dislike them at all.Make it three times, I nominate you for not liking nurses enough.
No, because its very easy to change IP addresses, the "Clever ones" also use proxy addresses, very difficult to "match"Can`t the staff or mods find out if the banned person comes back by just checking the persons IP address
No, because its very easy to change IP addresses, the "Clever ones" also use proxy addresses, very difficult to "match"
It would make our life a little easier, but then again, sometimes I'll check an IP address and it comes back with half a dozen matches,That`s a shame then.
OK guy's I guess its time to wrap this up.
This member hasn't been around for a few days now, when normally he's pretty active
Again the problem with that is, people are warned several times before they get a ban, unless of course its a spammer.
Unfortunately they don't take the hint / advice and continue, *they* are not likely to eat humble pie, but of course we will always discuss a request.
Aww bugger! I'm busy for a couple of days & miss all the guessing game fun.
I was sure it was gonna be .......... (the poster with a few vowels in his sig. & links to Spain. )
I wasn't aware you could limit access to profile pages, I just had to look at mine and yours to see what was there and to be honest, I can't find any reason for anyone wanting to limit access anyway, other than showing peoples posts, they don't exactly offer much information.As a sidelines anyone else notice the correlation between contentious members and those that limit access to their profiles
I wasn't aware you could limit access to profile pages, I just had to look at mine and yours to see what was there and to be honest, I can't find any reason for anyone wanting to limit access anyway, other than showing peoples posts, they don't exactly offer much information.
/Makes note ... Trouble maker one to watchI think this is a very good rule that staff and the mods have, before I came to this forum I got kicked off another forum.
They contain as much or as little as people want to add., they don't exactly offer much information.
Matt has the answer, but I have noticed that it often seems to be the members that have a habit of being a bit of a dick that tend to utilise this feature