And the camdiox 10 stops are awesome.
I totally agree with what you have said here I bought mine thinking it would be a good replacement for my 60d but find it a bit disappointing even on the intelligent setting the camera seems to miss the shot quite often! Shall be selling my mk11 to fund something else!I have to say that everybody is posting some really great quality shots from their RX100 II. However, I am very disappointed indeed with mine - Part of my problem is that I use a Canon DSLR with nothing but Macro and telephoto L lenses nearly every day and the RX100 is shockingly slow to focus by comparison and very tricky to navigate its settings. It's zoom is virtually non existent! My idea was to use it as a compact 'standard' lens but I am now thinking of selling it and going for a slightly larger compact which can fit a large pocket. I have had mine since December.
I have to say that everybody is posting some really great quality shots from their RX100 II. However, I am very disappointed indeed with mine - Part of my problem is that I use a Canon DSLR with nothing but Macro and telephoto L lenses nearly every day and the RX100 is shockingly slow to focus by comparison and very tricky to navigate its settings. It's zoom is virtually non existent! My idea was to use it as a compact 'standard' lens but I am now thinking of selling it and going for a slightly larger compact which can fit a large pocket. I have had mine since December.
Am considering one of these and this worries me. Used to nikon d700 and good glass so anything will be a step down I guess but slow/poor af is partly why I may sell my xpro.
I read that mk 1&2 is 28-100mm ff equiv but mk3 is 24-70, correct?
Very nice shots from the RX100 Peter!
Are these JPG SOOC? OR PP'd from RAW?
Look forward to seeing the results and your thoughts, Alan. Am thinking next year *might* be the time for me to upgrade my xf1. Am a little concerned about the limited zoom range though
one of the moon this evening - RX100 held up to the eyepiece of my scope
Wow that's very detailed
Am considering one of these and this worries me. Used to nikon d700 and good glass so anything will be a step down I guess but slow/poor af is partly why I may sell my xpro.
I read that mk 1&2 is 28-100mm ff equiv but mk3 is 24-70, correct?
just seen that the m3 is £505 @ Panamoz if you pay by BACS...