Seriously thinking about getting the A7II today as a second body, the current deal looks too good to miss particularly if I can chop in a lens I never use.
True but I imagine sigma lens will have better AF regardless.I wonder what the Sigma 45mm f2.8 will be like. I suppose it could be a really compact lens but if not I wonder if it'll get any interest at all as there's the Samyang f1.8.
PS.
Maybe it's a macro?
you are bit late to the party
Apparently a Sony 35mm f1.8 is also coming.
But sigma lenses certainly seem rather interesting.
@robinsslee - Got a reply from Mayfield lavender and it seems we have to pay the £100 since they need to hire someone to look after us out of hours.![]()
Ah, scrap that then, just like hiring an adult to babysit some people![]()
Lol true.
Well I work in Cambridge and Hitchin is not far. I'd like to do Tuesday to avoid crowds if possible but then it impacts work next day![]()


I need to find a place to shoot the milky way myself. Really hard being in London lol.Getting up at 2:00am to shoot the Milky Way and then going straight to work an hour early certainly impacts on work....![]()
Lol true.
Well I work in Cambridge and Hitchin is not far. I'd like to do Tuesday to avoid crowds if possible but then it impacts work next day![]()
Well, here's a few of poppies.
A9 + Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II
View attachment 248840View attachment 248839View attachment 248841
I need to find a place to shoot the milky way myself. Really hard being in London lol.
The problem with trying to preempt everyone is that everyone ends up thinking the sameI'd like to do Tuesday to avoid crowds if possible but then it impacts work next day![]()
The same happens every year at the Dockey Wood during the Bluebells. There are always a few photographers trampling through the bluebells to get a better view. They started to encircle the bluebells with twig walls to stop people walking through them but it’s not stopped people. It’s not only landscape photographers, portrait photographers are exactly the same. They walk over the twig walls to sit children amongst the bluebells to get the shot they have come for having no regard they are damaging the very reason they are thereBe glad that they charge a fee, otherwise it could very well be a nightmare:
https://qz.com/quartzy/1580867/all-the-tourist-destinations-ruined-by-instagram-this-year/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/califo...und-of-tourists-trampling-flowers-11553447888
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...se-chaos-lake-elsinore-poppy-apocalypse-vgtrn
I'd much rather pay the fee than suffer that [see the image in the second link] - and have the place to myself.
Sounds like you are in a similar predicament as me. Have you thought about an A6400 as a second body? That’s what I’m thinking of rather than a mk2 or mk1 A7 or A7r. It gives some good benefits over a A7i or A7ii and there is much in them cost wise.Seriously thinking about getting the A7II today as a second body, the current deal looks too good to miss particularly if I can chop in a lens I never use.
An A6400 would effectively make your 100-400 a 150-600 f4-f5.6 (the 200-600 would be a 300-900mm lens).True but cost is a major factor here, I can get the A7II for £700 after Sony cashback and I'm already committed to the 200-600 when it arrives on these shores although the 100-400 will almost certainly go.
The same happens every year at the Dockey Wood during the Bluebells. There are always a few photographers trampling through the bluebells to get a better view. They started to encircle the bluebells with twig walls to stop people walking through them but it’s not stopped people. It’s not only landscape photographers, portrait photographers are exactly the same. They walk over the twig walls to sit children amongst the bluebells to get the shot they have come for having no regard they are damaging the very reason they are there
Sounds like you are in a similar predicament as me. Have you thought about an A6400 as a second body? That’s what I’m thinking of rather than a mk2 or mk1 A7 or A7r. It gives some good benefits over a A7i or A7ii and there is much in them cost wise.
An A6400 would effectively make your 100-400 a 150-600 f4-f5.6 (the 200-600 would be a 300-900mm lens).
Ah but what if everyone thinks the same then they decide Friday is better and go on Friday insteadThe problem with trying to preempt everyone is that everyone ends up thinking the sameIt’s possible many photographers will think exactly the same and Tuesday will be busy because of it. Which ever day has the best forecast will get the most photographers. I could see Fridays being busy for normal people/families but that said they have the weekend to visit too so maybe it won’t be busy especially if photographers are thinking Tuesday will be the quiet day to visit and avoid Fridays.
It canCan the 200600 take the 1.4tc? If so = 1260mm
It can
Very nice, good that you managed to catch the sunWell, here's a few of poppies.
A9 + Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II
View attachment 248840View attachment 248839View attachment 248841
There are a few ‘pro’ photographers that do it but it’s often photographers taking portraits of the family that do it. During the main day time hours they have set up an entry fee to stop all of the damage caused by those visitors (and to get extra income in too).You would think pro photographers would have a bit more sense, I mean as you say they went there for the beauty of the landscape, and then proceed to ruin it - makes no sense. But it's mostly tourists or local families I see do this mostly at nice locations - like allowing their kids to pull the flowers to use as weapons or run through them with a stick or plastic sword chopping wildly
Can the 200600 take the 1.4tc? If so = 1260mm
Possibly a bit too unwieldily as it would need a fast shutter to freeze just the camera movement. With it being f8 that could be hard to get unless the light is very good.That’s a lot of zoomage
Ideally you'd want to head somewhere a little rural south of the M25 but tha depends where exactly you are I suppose.
We've only gone local to the Mendips which is Bortle 4 I think but it is only about half hours drive. South coast (Dorset) is popular & that's about 1hr 30mins away.
And dark as hell probably with rubbish IQIt takes the 2x.. 1800mm![]()
Possibly a bit too unwieldily as it would need a fast shutter to freeze just the camera movement. With it being f8 that could be hard to get unless the light is very good.
And dark as hell probably with rubbish IQ![]()
I don’t think I could do f8 at the times I try to get out at. I’m already struggling near sunrise at f5.6. I’m often ISO3200-6400 at this point and struggling to get near 1/500. A couple of hours later and things are better. As the light get stronger I can usually get down to ISO1250/1600 but once it’s up in the sky and really bright I’m off home unless I can find some nice dappled shade.I’d imagine the stabilisation system is very good, I’m guessing maybe 5 stops. Not impossible though, see lots of stuff shot at f8, the Sony’s hi iso is also very good.
I don’t think I could do f8 at the times I try to get out at. I’m already struggling near sunrise at f5.6. I’m often ISO3200-6400 at this point and struggling to get near 1/500. A couple of hours later and things are better. As the light get stronger I can usually get down to ISO1250/1600 but once it’s up in the sky and really bright I’m off home unless I can find some nice dappled shade.
I’d imagine the stabilisation system is very good, I’m guessing maybe 5 stops. Not impossible though, see lots of stuff shot at f8, the Sony’s hi iso is also very good.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen those numbers (f/13, 1/1000s, ISO 500) when I’ve been out. That looks like good light if you’re get f13 and 1/1000 at only ISO500.Not unusable at all with good light.
The 200-600mm + 2x TC on the A9 offer full AF performance with little to no observable degradation of AF speed. Here I was handholding a full-frame lens at 1200mm while tracking and capturing birds in flight. That is bonkers!
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/sony/fe-200-600mm-f5.6-6.3-g-oss/review/
Indeed, it's on the borderline for being too far and close enough to drive for a quick photo session. I wouldn't drive that far just to investigate though.
I drove previous day for sunset, slept in car, went back for sunrise and drove back. Was back home around 8am.
The drive isn't too bad. Just over two hours in the morning and just under 3 hours previous day thanks to a crash on M25.
The private ones are hard to get access to sometimes. Let us know if you have any luck in future
There is also a place near Brighton where I have seen pictures from previously. I could go investigate next year. Just didn't get the time this year.
I am just really surprised how under advertised these are. Probably a good thing though for us photographers
Do you know of any lavender fields that lets public access at sunset and sunrise?
The one near my place (just 20 minutes drive) doesn't give access at these times, just 9-5pm
I guess it all depends what times you’re out. If it’s out in the daytime it’s not as hard as early on. I’m usually a up to 2hrs after sunrise and 2hrs before sunset type so light levels aren’t high but you’re more likely to get the atmosphere. Teleconverters with these types of lenses aren’t for me.Peoples cases will be different, it’s not hard to achieve f8 at 1/500 on a decent day though. It’s not something people will use in dim light but the fact it’s possible and an option is pretty awesome.
Southwest London. I haven't found anywhere that's less than hour drive but I might have missed something