tamron 28-200 vs Sony 24-240
View: https://youtu.be/C2L-fRVhx6k
TL;DR - Sony lens is crap. Tamron is actually rather good for its kind in fact seems somewhat impressive for a superzoom.
Samyang 18mm and 24mm, Sony 35mm, 28mm and 28-70mm all sold and now on the lookout for a Sony 16-35mm f4
I wish the Sony’s had a feature where the camera could detect it was on a tripod and automatically turn off IBIS. Forgot to turn it off yesterday when using the 16-35mm because the 24-105 does it by a switch
I wish the Sony’s had a feature where the camera could detect it was on a tripod and automatically turn off IBIS. Forgot to turn it off yesterday when using the 16-35mm because the 24-105 does it by a switch
I wish the Sony’s had a feature where the camera could detect it was on a tripod and automatically turn off IBIS. Forgot to turn it off yesterday when using the 16-35mm because the 24-105 does it by a switch
Well they’ve not technically gone yet Yeah, got a good quote from MPB (after some negotiating) and doubt I’d get much more selling privately so it saves hassle.you should change your signature
Also that was quick!
Me neither.i have forgotten a few times myself but I have never actually noticed any issues though.
I wish the Sony’s had a feature where the camera could detect it was on a tripod and automatically turn off IBIS. Forgot to turn it off yesterday when using the 16-35mm because the 24-105 does it by a switch
I wish the Sony’s had a feature where the camera could detect it was on a tripod and automatically turn off IBIS. Forgot to turn it off yesterday when using the 16-35mm because the 24-105 does it by a switch
didn't realise mpb were open to negotiating on trade-in quotes. they seemed a bit set in stone kinda people lol
didn't realise mpb were open to negotiating on trade-in quotes. they seemed a bit set in stone kinda people lol
I’ve negotiated before and they’ve never gone back on it after receiving my lens(es) but I guess it could always happen.You sort of can, but there is always a caveat of condition, as they could just rank it less than you said it was to knock it back down. In my experience.
Either put a sticky label on your tripod head reminding you to turn off IBIS, or I actually keep it off as default and turn it on when I need it!
Does it actually make a difference?
The long exposure shots I posted before were on tripod and I never. Thought to turn it off [emoji849]
I actually did some tests about a 18 months ago as I wasn't sure if it made a difference and I knew I'd forget at some stage.
From the tests I did back then there was no noticeable difference really, I guess different cameras may have different results but it wasn't like using a DSLR and forgetting to turn the lens stabilisation off.
In theory, it could do. Not likely to be massively noticeable but it could.
I did have a look at a YT video, seemed to get the same findings as you
Very nice
I posted another in the R5 thread, shows a flying gull and a running dog from miles away, worth a look. The R6 AF is exactly the same.
That's pretty impressive, especially with the birds, amazing how quickly Canon have caught up and possibly beating Sony now with eye af.
In terms of animal Eye AF its way ahead. Havent looked at enough human stuff but again, looks very impressive, especially the distance it acquires from.
i do wonder how it compares to A9II
yeahWith animal eye AF?
yeah
Wrong thread
A9 is better
A9 is better
You could always have a “tripod landscape” custom setting with IBIS turned offNot a bad idea at all that!
You gunna switch to canon?[emoji23]
didn't realise mpb were open to negotiating on trade-in quotes. they seemed a bit set in stone kinda people lol
he's already done ages ago. why do you think he's being all pro-canon these daysYou gunna switch to canon?
I tend to go back to MBP with a clearly higher counteroffer. Usually end up agreeing a higher figure than they originally quote me for. Never had a problem with condition so never been knocked back.
he's already done ages ago. why do you think he's being all pro-canon these days