D
Deleted member 34016
Guest
Lovely shot!
Any cricket fans here?
@dancook - do you follow?
Was thinking of going to some matches this summer
Thank you buddy
Lovely shot!
Any cricket fans here?
@dancook - do you follow?
Was thinking of going to some matches this summer
Agreed, some of those 100-400mm shots look pretty ropey toodoesn't really do a side by side comparison and technical tests side by side.
i haven't found one so far and kinda kicking myself for not doing one when I very briefly had both.
Lovely shot!
Any cricket fans here?
@dancook - do you follow?
Was thinking of going to some matches this summer
And I thought we could be friendsi'm not interested in watching any sport happy to photograph it though - netball, squash, la crosse, fives, tennis, football, rugby, hockey, cricket
All kinds of lush!This was shot from Beacon Batch..... - https://www.lightpollutionmap.info/#zoom=12.23&lat=51.3137&lon=-2.7376&layers=B0TFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
*** [Explored] by Lee, on Flickr
All kinds of lush!
what time of the day did you take this picture?Thank you. If you compare that location on the light pollution map to most of Wales..... You should be fine
or someone to organise a wedding at midnightI live like 10 miles on the borders to Wales, should really try one of these....I have the gear, location, just need to get my ass out the door.
what time of the day did you take this picture?
I've got trip to Wales at the end of this month.Ummmmm... Maybe 3:30-4:30am by the time we swapped to this location.
Did you use the move shoot move for this shot?Ummmmm... Maybe 3:30-4:30am by the time we swapped to this location.
I've got trip to Wales at the end of this month.
Obviously shots I can get depends on the weather but hoping at least one of 3 nights will be clear.
Did you use the move shoot move for this shot?
No star trails at 60 seconds exposure?No. 35GM at f/1.6
No star trails at 60 seconds exposure?
On the subject of the 200-600G, if you guys knew how many times I've had that thing in my basket over the last 12m
When I got my Sigma 150-600c I wasn't as into bird photography as I am now and of course back then there was no Sony 200-600. So it's become pretty much my favourite genre of photography since and I use my Sigma 150-600 all the time, it's proved the best value lens I have bought for the amount of use it gets. So, what puts me off the 200-600 you might ask? Well the price is kind of a turn off being more than double what my Sigma cost, size annoys me a little, I know most people love having internal zoom for sealing benefits but I can chuck my Sigma in and A7iii in a small backpack when I head out to walk the dog and the Sony lens would require more planning/bigger backpack etc. On the positive side, the autofocus for moving animals/birds including in flight would definitely have a higher hit rate with the Sony lens. I don't see much difference in sharpness or image quality in general but that's subjective and can depend so much on so many variables. The sample variation really worries me too.
I guess I would like to see Sigma and Tamron release something native that went to 600mm, but looking at how Tamron have massively overpriced their new 150-500mm lens I am holding out less and less hope in that area. I think for now I will carry on with my Sigma and MC-11....
DSC02523-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
i too had the sigma and its a great lens and i ummed and arred about the sony then bit the bullet and got a good deal on black friday i agree image quality is pretty similar , but i seem to get more keepers with the sony , the main benefit for bif shots is the zoom you can zoom in and out with your thumb to find the bird, definatly get more shots with the sony the is seems better on the sony, the af is better being native although mc-11 does a decent job. i see you are in cumbriai am going up for a holiday at the end of may and you are welcome to try the Sony
No. Never used one in all honesty!
I am selling my Samyang 24/1.4, CV21 3.5E and CV40 1.4 Classic though.....
Has anyone got a FE/E fit fish eye that's no longer required?
why do you need AF for fisheye?I had a Samyang 12mm f/2.8 for a while bought from here was decent for the money but manual focus off course think the only other option is to buy the 28mm with the adaptor lens but it’s not a proper fish eye. Would get another fisheye if there was a good a.f option available.
why do you need AF for fisheye?
Anyway if anyone is looking for a good fisheye the TTartisan 11mm f2.8 fisheye is native, sharp and reasonably sized too. Manual lens of course.
if you are willing to adapt then Olympus OM 16mm f3.5 is really nice and small but like hen's tooth especially to find a good clean copy.
I had a Samyang 12mm f/2.8 for a while bought from here was decent for the money but manual focus off course think the only other option is to buy the 28mm with the adaptor lens but it’s not a proper fish eye. Would get another fisheye if there was a good a.f option available just for giggles.
A proper fish eye and and a tilt shift still don’t seem to be a priority for Sony or the third party brands, I guess they only sell in small numbers.
tape it around 2-3m and f8?I would only consider an a.f version as I wanted it for the odd photo at weddings. Manual focus isn’t a good option. Too much going on and other stuffed missed.
I had my eye on the 12mm, hard to find secondhand.
Ill look into those options @nandbytes thank you.
tape it around 2-3m and f8?
one of these:I had my eye on the 12mm, hard to find secondhand.
Ill look into those options @nandbytes thank you.
one of these:
TTArtisan 11mm F2.8 Fisheye Full Frame Camera Lens for Sony Leica Nikon Canon | eBay
Sony E / Leica L / Nikon Z / Canon EOS-R. for Leica L Leica SL (Typ 601). Leica SL2-S. Lens Mount. for Sony E Sony Alpha A5000. Sony Alpha A5100.www.ebay.co.uk
you can even get 10% off if you buy two
reviews:
(He has actually done a comparison with samyang 12mm fisheye)Sony Alpha Blog : TTArtisan 11mm F2.8 Fisheye
in Blue English / en noir en Français Presentation De-fishing the fisheye / Corriger le fisheye Optical performances / Performances optiques Comparison with / Comparison avec Samyang 12mm EF AS NCS…sonyalpha.blog
Dustin Abbot:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OlN9YoPupI
Phillip Reeve
Review: TTArtisan 11mm 2.8 Fisheye - phillipreeve.net
The TTArtisan 11mm 2.8 Fisheye is the first Fish-eye lens designed for fullframe mirrorless and the first fisheye lens for Leica-M, but it is a good idea tophillipreeve.net
It's a decent lens. Slightly soft corners at f2.8 which it nicely sharpens up by f4. Actually the concerns aren't as bad as Marc thinks it is because there is some field of curvature in play. So if you focus for the corners or mid frames, even at f2.8 it's perfectly usable and sharp enough.
You will definitely not miss the weight of the samyang
It is the only decent fisheye option available for FF mirrorless IMO.
Just be careful if you are looking at the Samyangs there is also a 12mm f/2 but it’a for APSC it’s the f/2.8 version version that is full frame.
I kind of regret letting it go now, as you say there isn’t a huge amount of them around used.
Keep an eye out for the version branded Wallimex and Rokinon as well, same thing.
one of these:
TTArtisan 11mm F2.8 Fisheye Full Frame Camera Lens for Sony Leica Nikon Canon | eBay
Sony E / Leica L / Nikon Z / Canon EOS-R. for Leica L Leica SL (Typ 601). Leica SL2-S. Lens Mount. for Sony E Sony Alpha A5000. Sony Alpha A5100.www.ebay.co.uk
you can even get 10% off if you buy two
reviews:
(He has actually done a comparison with samyang 12mm fisheye)Sony Alpha Blog : TTArtisan 11mm F2.8 Fisheye
in Blue English / en noir en Français Presentation De-fishing the fisheye / Corriger le fisheye Optical performances / Performances optiques Comparison with / Comparison avec Samyang 12mm EF AS NCS…sonyalpha.blog
Dustin Abbot:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OlN9YoPupI
Phillip Reeve
Review: TTArtisan 11mm 2.8 Fisheye - phillipreeve.net
The TTArtisan 11mm 2.8 Fisheye is the first Fish-eye lens designed for fullframe mirrorless and the first fisheye lens for Leica-M, but it is a good idea tophillipreeve.net
It's a decent lens. Slightly soft corners at f2.8 which it nicely sharpens up by f4. Actually the concerns aren't as bad as Marc thinks it is because there is some field of curvature in play. So if you focus for the corners or mid frames, even at f2.8 it's perfectly usable and sharp enough.
You will definitely not miss the weight of the samyang
It is the only decent fisheye option available for FF mirrorless IMO.
Super cheap those
Will not ship to Gods land aka Northen Ireland though.(n)
Years ago I worked for Systime computers and at one time I did the UK repairs for CDC SMD drives. As far as I remember there were two that you could desk or trolley mount and one high capacity drive that came trolley mounted. I think they might have been 20 and 40mb with the trolley mounted one being maybe 80mb. Even the lower mp count ones were so heavy it too two of us to lift them. One day when there was no one to help me I tried to pick an SMD drive up by myself and as a result I have a back injury to this day. The metal bashers worked further down in same room and they hated us electronic guys (they thought we were too posh and privileged) and as my station was near the walkway they used to turn the kit I was soak testing off as they walked by which was nice of them.
Later when I worked for DPCE the first batches of "Winchesters" arrived and I think they were 20mb, anyway they lost half their capacity once you mapped out the bad tracks.
It's amazing how far we've come.
Hope you enjoyed the history lesson
Yup there's also a 8mm APSC one, not ruled that out.
This post is awesome, thank you so much. Pretty much what I was looking for, I'll watch that later but I think you've found me the one!
Super cheap those
Will not ship to Gods land aka Northen Ireland though.(n)