- Messages
- 3,133
- Edit My Images
- No
$358 for an intervalometerWell, there's the Camranger. Shutter App (currently Apple only) but I'm still not sure what the slowest shutter speeds are on those because it doesn't go into that information.
$358 for an intervalometerWell, there's the Camranger. Shutter App (currently Apple only) but I'm still not sure what the slowest shutter speeds are on those because it doesn't go into that information.
$358 for an intervalometer, i cant even find out if the USB-C supports shutter control, if it does, its only a matter of time before someone makes one, wouldnt be hard to modify current one either if you knew the pin out.
Also after advice on primes. I have about £1k to spend and ideally want a 35/85 set up. Do I pick up the Sony 1.8 versions or alternatives. Could splurge on a 35 GM at an absolute push, but ideally wanted both FLs covered for the price….for family photography as I have 2 young kids.
Yes $358 - Hence I still have the A7 in my bagI think it does support shutter control. I've read you can start video recording via USB so.....
Anyway, no rush![]()
They'll be out eventually then, took a while when the 1st A7 came out, i remember waiting a while back then. Need someone to try a USB-C adapter.A7c can be controlled via. USB-C but no one has bothered to make one for it because rest of the cameras have the old multiport![]()
I'm happy try an adapter if you can point me towards one....They'll be out eventually then, took a while when the 1st A7 came out, i remember waiting a while back then. Need someone to try a USB-C adapter.
Would one of these work i wonder. Isn't the micro usb port on the cameras not quite a standard usb micro.I'm happy try an adapter if you can point me towards one....
Would one of these work i wonder. Isn't the micro usb port on the cameras not quite a standard usb micro.
EasyULT 4 Pack Micro USB to USB-C Adapter, Type C (Male) to Micro USB (Female) Converter Type C Adapter Compatible with Galaxy S8/S8+, S20 Note 20, Huawei P10 Plus/Honor 8, LG G6 and More(Black) https://smile.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07BR...abc_ZE1BVPRHN8WT3Y005WH9?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
I tried looking for the pin out, I'd just rewire a cable then. But couldn't find one.
Need to find the pinout for the a7c USBC port, find the focus and shutter pins and easy job to make a cable.No they are Sony multiport. Multiport does support micro USB but I don't think the other way round holds true.
My intervalometer has a multiport so not sure if standard micro USB adapters will work.
Easy enough to find it for multiport since you can buy themNeed to find the pinout for the a7c USBC port, find the focus and shutter pins and easy job to make a cable.
See my previous post, already know that side of things, just the USBC bit.Easy enough to find it for multiport since you can buy them
So it'd be an idea to chop it up and reattach a USB-C.
Yeah a smaller 35 and a 1.4 85 could be an option. The 85 is only going to see use on dedicated photo opportunities, the 35 is the daily lens so makes sense to keep the 35 smaller and lighter.
tamron 28-200mmI still think the D750 was better in some way. Also all review put them at the same level, I think the iso performance of the nikon was better and the colours more natural looking. I definitely see more grain in the A7iii. Also often with the A7iii the picture look extremely sharp on the back screen and just ok once downloaded.
On the plus side for the A7iii, I like the configuration of all the button. Really made it fit my need perfectly. I have on the rear thumb BBF, eye focus and manual focus override (press joystick).
AF points all over the screen is useful too.
The first lens I bought was a Samyang 35mm f2.8 and it is my most used lens. Make the camera very compact. I since bought the samyang 18mm and 75mm. All part of the tiny serie which is also very cheap.
Although I really like shooting with prime, I wish for these lazy days I had the 24-105 f4 but it's too big and expensive for now. Any recommendation on a good lens which a similar zoom range?
I still think the D750 was better in some way. Also all review put them at the same level, I think the iso performance of the nikon was better and the colours more natural looking. I definitely see more grain in the A7iii. Also often with the A7iii the picture look extremely sharp on the back screen and just ok once downloaded.
On the plus side for the A7iii, I like the configuration of all the button. Really made it fit my need perfectly. I have on the rear thumb BBF, eye focus and manual focus override (press joystick).
AF points all over the screen is useful too.
The first lens I bought was a Samyang 35mm f2.8 and it is my most used lens. Make the camera very compact. I since bought the samyang 18mm and 75mm. All part of the tiny serie which is also very cheap.
Although I really like shooting with prime, I wish for these lazy days I had the 24-105 f4 but it's too big and expensive for now. Any recommendation on a good lens which a similar zoom range?
Usual Samyang decentering probably.Sharpness just shouldn't be an issue.
Don't suppose you were at Moses Gate this morning were you. That's one of the birds i saw someone shooting there.
Don't suppose you were at Moses Gate this morning were you. That's one of the birds i saw someone shooting there.
.The first and best word that immediately came to mind when seeing these was 'magical'.
I still think the D750 was better in some way. Also all review put them at the same level, I think the iso performance of the nikon was better and the colours more natural looking. I definitely see more grain in the A7iii. Also often with the A7iii the picture look extremely sharp on the back screen and just ok once downloaded.
On the plus side for the A7iii, I like the configuration of all the button. Really made it fit my need perfectly. I have on the rear thumb BBF, eye focus and manual focus override (press joystick).
AF points all over the screen is useful too.
The first lens I bought was a Samyang 35mm f2.8 and it is my most used lens. Make the camera very compact. I since bought the samyang 18mm and 75mm. All part of the tiny serie which is also very cheap.
Although I really like shooting with prime, I wish for these lazy days I had the 24-105 f4 but it's too big and expensive for now. Any recommendation on a good lens which a similar zoom range?
I always find Nikon colours more natural tbh, at least using standard camera profiles in Lightroom. Sony is better using color fidelity, but I still find Nikon better.The D750 does produces slightly cleaner files at base I.S.O and up to about I.S.O 800 but is no where near as good at higher I.S.O, that is just my opinion though having at one time owned 6 x D750's and switched to A7III's in the first instance. Sony colours are more accurate than Nikon but sometimes Nikon colours can look more pleasing. It took me a little while to learn how to tweak Sony files to look how I want them.
If you are having a problem with sharpness that will likely be down to the Samyang lenses which often just aren't very good. Samyang basically only make one decent lens for e-mount the 45mm f/1.8. There is huge copy variation with Samyang lenses, you may need to try several copies to find one that is half decent.
The Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 is small and light weight for an f/2.8 mid range zoom and is pretty sharp, there is a new version coming soon which is supposed to be sharper again.
Most people will prefer Nikon or Canon colours straight out if camera but Sony is more accurate. That isnt always a good thing though.I always find Nikon colours more natural tbh, at least using standard camera profiles in Lightroom. Sony is better using color fidelity, but I still find Nikon better.
As I said I’ve always found Nikon (D750, D850, Z7) more accurate than Sony (A7RIV, A9-II) using Lightroom. I also find Nikon auto WB better, which weirdly is also the opposite of what you find if my memory serves me correctly.Most people will prefer Nikon or Canon colours straight out if camera but Sony is more accurate. That isnt always a good thing though.
Never heard of colour fidelity before. A quick google and I see it's a preset worth 25$ per camera. Sound a bit expensive for a profile.I always find Nikon colours more natural tbh, at least using standard camera profiles in Lightroom. Sony is better using color fidelity, but I still find Nikon better.
It is but was worth it for me as I’m much happier with the files it produces. Never been a fan of Sony’s profiles and the Adobe ones are too magenta to my eyes. YMMV.Never heard of colour fidelity before. A quick google and I see it's a preset worth 25$ per camera. Sound a bit expensive for a profile.