Bit behind on the gear side of things, has anyone made a decent 24mm 1.8 yet?
Samyang have one but expect the usual Samyang issues as do Viltrox but they are even worse.
In terms of decent no.
Just get the 24GM and be happy.
The samyang 24mm f1.8 seems to optically exceptional at least according to this guyBit behind on the gear side of things, has anyone made a decent 24mm 1.8 yet?
I already have the 24GM
Just thinking of something smaller for travel/holiday use and that could maybe go on a crop body for 35 equiv
Maybe look at the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN instead of the GM, a good number of reviewers have found it sharper and better focus. The only area the GM is better is contrast with backlit subjects.Been mulling over my 70-180/70-200 plan. Just thinking that I could sell my Batis 135 and Sony FE85/1.8, and then buy the Tamron and either the 85/1.4 GM or 100 STF GM for roughly the same budget as the 70-200 GM Mk1.
I don't often shoot below f2.8-f4, so thinking that the STF might be quite a good fun lens to complement the 70-180. What does everyone think?
Maybe look at the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN instead of the GM, a good number of reviewers have found it sharper and better focus. The only area the GM is better is contrast with backlit subjects.
The STF is effectively 5.6, misleading marketing from Sony, having said that it's one i've been considering recently along with the Batis 135. The size and weight of the Batis really appeals to me and I have no use for anything that long below 2.8, almost pulled the trigger on one today as I have a holiday coming up and want something light and long.Been mulling over my 70-180/70-200 plan. Just thinking that I could sell my Batis 135 and Sony FE85/1.8, and then buy the Tamron and either the 85/1.4 GM or 100 STF GM for roughly the same budget as the 70-200 GM Mk1.
I don't often shoot below f2.8-f4, so thinking that the STF might be quite a good fun lens to complement the 70-180. What does everyone think?
Obviously the first bit is subjective, I love the look from the Sigma and from the examples below it looks nicer than the GM to my eyes, YMMV.You forget the G.M has much nicer rendering and fall off as well. With this type of lens that is more important than anything else if using it for portraits.
The Sigma is clinically sharper but as you know yourself struggles with a.f at high frame rates and in backlit situations.
Obviously the first bit is subjective, I love the look from the Sigma and from the examples below it looks nicer than the GM to my eyes, YMMV.
AF is generally great (20/20 in Manny's video), it's just shooting my dog running towards the camera that I've had 'issues' with, but then shooting a dog running towards the camera at f1.4 is asking a bit much? Even the 70-200mm GM2 doesn't nail every shot in this scenario. What I have found with my recent testing is that flexible single point AF is more accurate than expandable flexible single point which I've normally used. Obviously it won't do 20fps, only 15fps.
I don't think AF struggles in backlight, it's the contrast which is clearly much better on the GM in this scenario.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDU2TH6yo40&ab_channel=MannyOrtiz
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOYk-5UZZVk&ab_channel=JaredPolin
Recently my lens want list has changed a lot, what I want is:-
35mm f1.4 GM
50mm f1.2 GM
85mm f1.4 GM
That was before I actually looked into it, I just assumed I’d prefer the GMI do find it strange though that you say that you prefer the Sigma when only a few days ago you said.
I sold my Sony 85 and 135 F1.8's for the Tamron 70-180 F2.8Been mulling over my 70-180/70-200 plan. Just thinking that I could sell my Batis 135 and Sony FE85/1.8, and then buy the Tamron and either the 85/1.4 GM or 100 STF GM for roughly the same budget as the 70-200 GM Mk1.
I don't often shoot below f2.8-f4, so thinking that the STF might be quite a good fun lens to complement the 70-180. What does everyone think?
I guess how images look is subjective but I personally and I know many others dislike the Sigma rendering and fall off across there lens range, and that is also evident with the 85mm. It is a very sharp lens.
I personally have seen many instances were the Siggy 85mm struggles badly with a.f in backlit situations. Just as one example I helped another photographer out quite a few times over the pandemic, they also shot for me a few times as well. She had the Siggy 85mm. At a lot of church weddings in particular the bride is often walking up the aisle in strong backlight. The Siggy was almost useless for this as it really struggled to lock on. She also shoots a lot of backlit portraits and had issues there as well. She isn't the only one either I have seen lots of other wedding photographers complaining about the same thing on social media. This became such an annoyance for her she ended up ditching the Siggy for a Sony 85 f/1.8. To be fair I warned her against that as the 85 f/1.8 produces lots of C.,A in backlit situations. She ended up replacing it later with the G.M for that reason.
I keep looking at this lens, but I think I'm going to try the Samyang 35mm f1.8 first to see if I like shooting a lot with a 35mm. The lack of aperture ring lock is something that might put me off too. It produces lovely images though.
I keep looking at this lens, but I think I'm going to try the Samyang 35mm f1.8 first to see if I like shooting a lot with a 35mm. The lack of aperture ring lock is something that might put me off too. It produces lovely images though.
It's quite a bit more expensive than the Samyang and wouldn't want to spend that kind of money on a lens I'm not sure I'd use much. The Samyang looks to render nicely hereI like 35mm and modern lens wise I have the Sony f1.8 and f2.8 and the Voigtlander f1.4 (if that can be classed as modern) so I don't know why I keep looking at this one, because it's supposed to be so good I expect
It's probably on the large size for me though as even the Sony f1.8 is getting a bit big for me so I'll almost certainly not get this f1.4.
I remember Manny Ortiz liking the Sony 35mm f1.8, he seems to have quite a few vids featuring it. Aren't you tempted by it?
It's quite a bit more expensive than the Samyang and wouldn't want to spend that kind of money on a lens I'm not sure I'd use much. The Samyang looks to render nicely here
I’ve got Harrisons 20mins away but it seems like the other end of the earth sometimesAh. I see.
I used to be mostly 50 but seem to have drifted to 35 and at the mo and today / this week it's 28mm.
Bit naughty posting this here but on the subject of focal lengths... Of the pictures I took today, dull, flat light and spotting on a bit, I think this is my favourite. Taken with a 14mm f2.5 on MFT, 28mm equiv.
PS.
Looking at the 50mm f1.2 and 35mm f1.4 in vids they don't seem to look as big as they do on the camera comparison site so maybe I could be tempted but I'd have to see and handle the lenses myself and there's little chance of that as there's no camera shops here just Currys and they don't have anything that interesting.
We used to have a London Camera Exchange and a local company called Dents but they went a while back and are just left with Currys. Luckily Sheffield’s not too far but I just tend to buy online now too.I think for me it would mean a trip to Newcastle or Leeds, possibly Durham. There used to be three in Middlesbrough town centre but now, none. That's why I buy stuff on line now.
Thanks for the reply. I thought it didn’t but thought I’d check as it’s the first battery I’ve ever had not to come with one. Seems a strange think not to have as standard considering what can happen if the terminals are shorted on a lithium ion battery.Fz100 does not come with a cover.
I bought a couple of boxes from amazon, stores a couple of memory cards in the lid tooThanks for the reply. I thought it didn’t but thought I’d check as it’s the first battery I’ve ever had not to come with one. Seems a strange think not to have as standard considering what can happen if the terminals are shorted on a lithium ion battery.
For those that use eye af a lot do you specify the eye to focus on or set it to Auto? If the latter does the camera do a good job of focussing on the nearest eye, and do you have any ‘tricks’ that help the camera pick up on the nearest eye, especially in cases where the distance to camera is not that different between the two eyes?
I use Auto. It’s very good at selecting the closest eye. Actually it’s pretty Voodoo...For those that use eye af a lot do you specify the eye to focus on or set it to Auto? If the latter does the camera do a good job of focussing on the nearest eye, and do you have any ‘tricks’ that help the camera pick up on the nearest eye, especially in cases where the distance to camera is not that different between the two eyes?
I’m sending some batteries to MPB so wanted to check if there were covers to look for or not. MPB seems the only safe selling rote as you cant post batteries on their own so privates sales are nearly impossible. I’m guessing MPB have an agreement as they know if the parcel they’ve arranged to collect has spare batteries.I bought a couple of boxes from amazon, stores a couple of memory cards in the lid too
I purchased a new Samyang 35mm 1.8 recently as small street photography lens but sent it back. There was was something about the rendering, especially out of focus areas that looked odd and messy to my eye. Maybe it’s just different to all the other Sony native lenses I own. Switched to Sony 40mm 2.5 GI keep looking at this lens, but I think I'm going to try the Samyang 35mm f1.8 first to see if I like shooting a lot with a 35mm. The lack of aperture ring lock is something that might put me off too. It produces lovely images though.
I purchased a new Samyang 35mm 1.8 recently as small street photography lens but sent it back. There was was something about the rendering, especially out of focus areas that looked odd and messy to my eye. Maybe it’s just different to all the other Sony native lenses I own. Switched to Sony 40mm 2.5 G
OK thanks, the exmples I’ve seen look nice but you only ever know properly when you try yourselfI purchased a new Samyang 35mm 1.8 recently as small street photography lens but sent it back. There was was something about the rendering, especially out of focus areas that looked odd and messy to my eye. Maybe it’s just different to all the other Sony native lenses I own. Switched to Sony 40mm 2.5 G
I’m sending some batteries to MPB so wanted to check if there were covers to look for or not. MPB seems the only safe selling rote as you cant post batteries on their own so privates sales are nearly impossible. I’m guessing MPB have an agreement as they know if the parcel they’ve arranged to collect has spare batteries.
Likewise, I have several Nikon ones sat in a draw.I have a spare Canon R5/R6 battery I don't know what to do with, I was going to keep it but perhaps MPB would buy it .... cheers for that, didn't give them a thought.
Theres one on birdforum think its £7700What's a good price for a used 400mm 2.8?
I see there's one on ebay, not too old, excellent condition for £9000 - but they are new £10,500 - so I'm not sold