Ahh, google lied to me, it said it was only 10fps but after just going on the Sony site I see that it's 10fps Mechanical and 30fps electronic
Yeah 1s shooting is not ideal, although I'm not sure if I've ever continuously shot for much longer than this. Adding pre-capture does alter things, although if I was shooting anything that requires pre-capture I'm guessing I'd be using the mechanical shutter to avoid rolling shutter.
I'd prefer the R5ii myself but A7RVI does have other benefits. Likely better EVF, matched dual cards, fully articulated screen, better battery life, dynamic range.
Also now it has illuminated buttons
I have shot plenty in the dark, and i mostly shoot with muscle memory. Never had an issue but apparently there are people who need this
2/3rd stop definitely makes a difference and especially in the UK.
bcgforums.com
These are very marginal differences, and illuminated buttons are mainly for new users. Its a tough one when staying on canon practically means pretty much no new lenses everI'd prefer the R5ii myself but A7RVI does have other benefits. Likely better EVF, matched dual cards, fully articulated screen, better battery life, dynamic range.
Also now it has illuminated buttons
I have shot plenty in the dark, and i mostly shoot with muscle memory. Never had an issue but apparently there are people who need this
This is a whole new category lens, not like for like update. It looks like it is a winner, and wallet is happy because i have zero need for anything like this
Surprising that he says 200-600 is sharper than 100-400mm with TC while Dustin A says the exact oppositeAn objective review.
My Sony 100-400 F4.5 Real World Review!
WHEW! I just finished my review of the new Sony 100-400 F/4.5 - and honestly, this lens turned out to be a lot more interesting than I expected. :) On paper, it doesn’t really dominate the other options in Sony’s lineup, but after spending time shooting with it in the field, there were a few...
Cheap hood for a cheap lens by barrysprout, on Flickr
I used to think that but I paid that for my A1, and if I had the money I'd definitely buy a Leica M11 which is even crazier money
If anyone else uses the 28mm Viltrox chip lens I’ve got another of these hoods going spare. I can post it in freebies if someone wants it.All this talk of expensive cameras and lenses has given me a gas attack!
Checked the bank account and I’ve settled for a 10p hood for my £60 lens
Even if i had the money not sure I'd buy one tbhI used to think that but I paid that for my A1, and if I had the money I'd definitely buy a Leica M11 which is even crazier money
It's obviously a very personal thing, but I very much like the rendering of the Leica M lenses (not so much SL lenses), and I like the fully manual aspect using oldschool focussing aids rather than peaking and zoom. It's more the engagement of taking the photo, however it wouldn't be for all scenarios obviously. I'd not want to use manual focus for wildlife and motorsport.Even if i had the money not sure I'd buy one tbh
Just doesn't feel great to use in hand, don't get the hype. May be one needs to spend another 2 grand on accessories to make it nice to hold, who knows, may be i have got it all wrong
I used to think that but I paid that for my A1, and if I had the money I'd definitely buy a Leica M11 which is even crazier money
I was contemplating medium format, probably a Yashica but my god have those things gone up in price recentlyI bought the QL17 as a tester into using a rangefinder patch
My Yashica FX3 uses split prizm or whatever it's called.
I was contemplating medium format, probably a Yashica but my god have those things gone up in price recently
Edit: it’s rolleiflex I’m thinking of not yashica that’re crazy prices now.
but it is so nice to shoot with.
