I've been lurking around this thread for far too long now without posting, so as we're seeing lots of pics at the moment, I thought I'd join in.
This small hoverfly was taken with the 90mm macro, one of my favourite lenses, which has seen a lot of use of this spring and summer.
TP52 Week15 Eristalis pertinax by Peter C, on Flickr
In actual fact as you probably already know your/ones natural body stabilisation is by far the best option when shooting from a boat or anything else moving about. The only time a tripod is of any use is if whatever its standing on is stable.
George.
I've been lurking around this thread for far too long now without posting, so as we're seeing lots of pics at the moment, I thought I'd join in.
My old film era manual lens fixation seems to have taken off again as after buying the Nikon 50mm f1.8 pancake I've followed up with a 35mm f2.5 and a 28mm f2.8. Oh well, it's a relatively cheap obsession
I'm pretty sure his collection has its own roomI know it's a tongue in cheek joke, but is all your stuff put away Alan or do you have it in a display cabinet?
I know it's a tongue in cheek joke, but is all your stuff put away Alan or do you have it in a display cabinet?
I'm pretty sure his collection has its own room
Since I got married I don't have a room as such as every space seems to belong to Mrs WW.
I think it's a rule.
While I'm here. I made a bramble and apple crumble. Yum Yum. A7 and Nikon 50mm f2+ No.4 close up filter.
Always custard with a crumble....haha.
My customers had the choice of extra thick cream or custard. I had custard.
Always custard with a crumble....
The only lens I have on display is a Minolta Rokkor 35mm f2.8 MC. It's a lovely lens but the coating on the inner element is gone and it's completely unusable as a lens. It still looks nice though.
I tend to keep my lenses in metal biscuit tins lined with bubble wrap. I have three tins full and an over spill cardboard box which is filling up too so I'll have to stop buying but in my defence I do use them all, eventually, and compared to what some others spend on gear the £200 or so I've spent recently on three lenses is small beer. The reason for the new Nikons is that I really like the ones I have so I wanted to fill the gaps so that if I take more than one lens out I don't need to take extra adaptors too.
A 50 and a 35 or 28mm should make a nice two lens set.
You've now made me hungry Alan and its got to be custard with it!!Since I got married I don't have a room as such as every space seems to belong to Mrs WW.
I think it's a rule.
While I'm here. I made a bramble and apple crumble. Yum Yum. A7 and Nikon 50mm f2+ No.4 close up filter.
I've had some nice cars but a happy byproduct of being a workaholic in a decent job was that I always paid cash. If a car is needed a cheap hatchback will do but no one needs a high end car on finance, imo.I'm sure someone will buy you some biscuits for Christmas
And, crumble should be with custard imo
And...... Another thing seeing as you mentioned money. Someone I work with took out a 5-6 year £25k loan for a Jag XKR 14 months ago paying back about £32-35k I think. They've just traded it in for £11k for an F-Pace SVR on lease paying £580 a month...... And I was undecided about blowing £1100 on a used 24GM!!
I'm sure someone will buy you some biscuits for Christmas
And, crumble should be with custard imo
And...... Another thing seeing as you mentioned money. Someone I work with took out a 5-6 year £25k loan for a Jag XKR 14 months ago paying back about £32-35k I think. They've just traded it in for £11k for an F-Pace SVR on lease paying £580 a month...... And I was undecided about blowing £1100 on a used 24GM!!
I'm sure someone will buy you some biscuits for Christmas
And, crumble should be with custard imo
And...... Another thing seeing as you mentioned money. Someone I work with took out a 5-6 year £25k loan for a Jag XKR 14 months ago paying back about £32-35k I think. They've just traded it in for £11k for an F-Pace SVR on lease paying £580 a month...... And I was undecided about blowing £1100 on a used 24GM!!
Thanks DaveThat`s a cracking shot Peter.
Think I may have discovered spidermans secret identity.
View attachment 290452View attachment 290453
The second one is a cracking image and very Spiderman pose shot.
There's an interesting piece on DPR comparing a 7artisans 35mm f1.4 to a much more expensive Leica. As both of these lenses could be used on Sony mirrorless this could be interesting.
Spot the differences: Comparing a $430 35mm F1.4 7Artisans lens to Leica's $5,895 Summilux-M
How much does image quality differ between 7Artisans' $430 35mm F1.4 lens and Leica's $5,895 Summilux-M 35mm F1.4? Leica Rumors decided to put the two lenses to a test in a blind comparison.www.dpreview.com
It's from here...
Blind test: Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH lens vs. the new 7Artisans 35mm f/1.4 lens - Leica Rumors
A quick comparison between the Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH lens ($5895) and the new 7Artisans 35mm f/1.4 lens ($430) - can you guess which photo was taken with which lens? The answers can be found in the comments section below. The full resolution files can also be downloaded here. The new...leicarumors.com
Has anyone ever tried a 7artisans lens? They do seem to be good value.
That's a cracker Les, I regularly used the 100-400 as a macro lens but haven't tried the 200-600 yet.I tried the 200-600mm G lens on some small stuff too ( a7Riii)
DSC06140 Buttefly by Les Moxon, on Flickr
Les
That's a cracker Les, I regularly used the 100-400 as a macro lens but haven't tried the 200-600 yet.
I really like that, better viewed on flickr where I can see the whole image on my screenOh and this from today Not close up but I like it
DSC06062 Egret Standing Tall by Les Moxon, on Flickr
I've had some nice cars but a happy byproduct of being a workaholic in a decent job was that I always paid cash. If a car is needed a cheap hatchback will do but no one needs a high end car on finance, imo.
But life is short, you're only here once etc.
As a young fella I would happily spend half of my monthly wages into paying for a car. Crazy isn’t it.
At the moment I have 2 cars but they are bought and paid for. Don’t think I would ever go down the route again of shelling out hundreds every month to have a fancy new car at the door.
Maybe I am just getting old.
My wee brother has an Audi R8 have no idea what he pays every month but I imagine when you add the cost of insurance etc he is probably shelling out not far off a grand a month.
The F-Pace SVR is a very lovely car but I’d reckon the first year depreciation on that is around 15k. How much camera gear could you get for that?
Face mask + glasses + camera up to my face = permanent fog. Pretty pleased I managed to get anything as I had no idea what I was shooting! a7RII and Tamron 70-180mm 2.8.
DSC03214 by Chris Harrison, on Flickr
DSC03201 by Chris Harrison, on Flickr
Think I may have discovered spidermans secret identity.
View attachment 290452View attachment 290453