sk66
Advertiser
- Messages
- 8,679
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I think he was fair with that aspect.I have always said that better gear allows you to get good shotts easier and more consistently. A well lit environment is not really the place to explain why you buy expensive kit. Let them try a wedding on a very bright day, and dry and capture details from a white dress & a dark suit at the same time or put them under pressure to get a particular shot in an everyday scene. 9 times out of 10, a good photographer with good gear will bring it home, an average tog with average gear won't....
That really is always the case, content over quality... it's only photographers that get wrapped up about the minor details.Im not surprised
You only need to look at facebook and flickr "likes" to see that for most folks, content is more important than overall quality.
OK, the camera geeks, and the art directors would be able to identify which camera took which picture but clients/Average folk and the dummies who think sharpness is the most important aspect of a photograph still would not be able to tell the difference.Could be fun to see that demo repeated with same aged cameras and lenses
If the test was re-done with A2 or A1 prints the outcome could be quite different. The question is whether printing large is important to your business. It is to mine.. up to some extent.