My thoughts too, makes the XT2 look as strong as ever IMO. I know the T3 has some snazzy extras, but from what I've seen they would suit videographers mostly. For your stills shooter, nothing in it unless you're really nit picking.
It's a little better at that range from what I've seen ... so long as you're checking at 400% ... seriously, I think some reviewers are try harding to make it look better. There is more detail held at that range, but I for one don't ever go anywhere near that, keep me under 3200 and I'm all good. There's zero difference to that point from what I've seen. And the X-T2 was already about the best of the APSC world up to that point. So, even if it's a bit behind, it still remains better than the likes of the A6500, 80D, all M43, D7*** whatever. It didn't suddenly get worse because of it's new big bro
Puzzles me why people who had no interest in the XT2 suddenly want a piece of this T3 .. there's really nothing in it outside of faster AF and better video features.
What attracts me now though, is the price drops on the good ol' XT2. If it continues to drop it's going to be a right steal.