I've not been able to do anything with my new X-T2 in the past few days (inner ear problems) but today I finally got as far as taking the first step that I'd planned - taking the same picture with the same lens (35mm f/2) with both the X-T10 and the X-T2 and comparing the results.
I won't bore you with the pictures, which are very dull, but I concluded a few things.
(i) There is a certain amount of difference in the RAW files between how an X-Trans 2 and an X-Trans 3 render colours. Tentatively, this seems to be favouring red a bit more in the X-Trans 3, green a bit more in the X-Trans 2. This is most noticeable in things that are strongly yellow, and in the shade of grass. It's not too difficult to match them if desired. SOOC, I think I prefer the X-Trans 3 rendering.
(ii) The ability of the 35mm prime and the 24MP sensor to render detail are a very nice match. Wow!
(iii) I agree with what others have said: with the increased cooperation between Fuji and Adobe over X-Trans 3, the default sharpening in LR seems quite satisfactory and I don't feel the need to use the X-Transformer plugin, based on what I've seen so far.
Picture is with the X-T10, which will in future be my backup camera, and for use with the Rhinocam...
Merry Christmas one and all!
Savonnerie Santa by
David Hallett, on Flickr