Timing will be the big issue. Peak demand could be as close as two weeks away by current predictions. How many ventilators will we have by then, from whatever source?
The govt already has 8000 ventilators coming aside from the tens of thousands of ventilators they have asked British companies to make.
Maybe we could use the EU scheme we have been invited on???
The worst thing about that is the way the story has changed. A bit like my dog eating the homework!!
Though most of the press reports say something Company X is beginning to make Y thousand ventilators but beginning to make doesn’t tell us how many they are producing per week. I must say, I have wondered why they say 10,000 rather than 100,000 if they are only beginning .
We already have around 8k ventilators. Plus the 8k expected within the next couple of weeks, One UK manufacturer has tripled their production, Dyson expect to be in production within a couple of weeks, plus other companies also collaborating within the UK.Though most of the press reports say something Company X is beginning to make Y thousand ventilators but beginning to make doesn’t tell us how many they are producing per week. I must say, I have wondered why they say 10,000 rather than 100,000 if they are only beginning .
The govt already has 8000 ventilators coming aside from the tens of thousands of ventilators they have asked British companies to make.
From my second link.I take it you've read the link posted.
The government insisted it was on track to deliver tens of thousands of ventilators.
Is that the same government that said there was plenty of PPE.
Chris Hopson, chief executive of National Health Service Providers, on Thursday said a shortage of ventilators was already a “real issue” for hospitals in London. It's clear that they [hospitals] will run out of critical care capacity, probably by the weekend”.
So already an issue now not in the coming weeks.
Edward Argar, junior health minister, said the NHS would start to see a “steady delivery” of 8,000 ventilators “over the coming week, two weeks, three weeks”.
Officials have indicated 30,000 would be required in total. I suppose a junior minister is easier to throw under the bus.
Dyson, the vacuum maker, on Wednesday said it had received a government order for 10,000 ventilators that it designed in 10 days. It expects to begin deliveries in “weeks”,
The government said this hinges on the ventilators passing regulatory and safety tests.
So still to pass regulatory and safety test, I wonder how long that takes.
But businesses already involved in the production of medical devices have questioned the government’s approach, arguing that it should have engaged more with specialist suppliers.
“The government appears to be much faster to communicate with the non-medical ventures than they do with the existing medical device supply chain,” said an engineer at one company who asked not to be named.
So companies that make and supply medical equipment have not been approached.
But that's OK we have Dyson (make good hovers), Airbus (make good planes) Nissan and McLaren (both make good cars) not quite the same as producing ventilators.
EDIT I've just your last post so Ford are involved as well, so how many are packed and ready to go.
From my second link.
"A consortium called Ventilator Challenge UK, involving companies including Airbus, Rolls-Royce and Ford, is separately providing the manufacturing muscle to scale up production of proven models already made by the specialist UK firms Smiths and Penlon."
Seems you're wrong in your assumptions
I havent seen any sources saying that. I've heard them say on the news they have 8000 critical care beds ready but not another 8000 ventilators on their way?
Timing will be the big issue. Peak demand could be as close as two weeks away by current predictions. How many ventilators will we have by then, from whatever source?
One of my links said the manufacturer will be providing training on the ventilators use to any nurses not familiar with its use.More respirators is only part of the problem, you also need the staff to operate them. Not every nurse is an ICU nurse.
So just having more doesn't mean we can use more anyway.
Why are you asking me? I'm not making them or shipping them.All from your first link
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...BBAL&usg=AOvVaw3FRye-ZLlsCVxyFbuJ5pUS&cf=1
So how many are ready to go now and how long before the 30,000 officials have indicated would be required in total.
Not that vague, there will be a steady flow of delivery over the next few weeks until the 8k are delivered.Hmmmm interesting: - Edward Argar, junior health minister, said the NHS would start to see a “steady delivery” of 8,000 ventilators “over the coming week, two weeks, three weeks”.
Vague as a fart in the wind and about half as useful.
Though most of the press reports say something Company X is beginning to make Y thousand ventilators but beginning to make doesn’t tell us how many they are producing per week. I must say, I have wondered why they say 10,000 rather than 100,000 if they are only beginning.
We already have around 8k ventilators. Plus the 8k expected within the next couple of weeks, One UK manufacturer has tripled their production, Dyson expect to be in production within a couple of weeks, plus other companies also collaborating within the UK.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...BhAC&usg=AOvVaw3dCB4Zu4hhIu3PJljJ8omH&cf=1
More respirators is only part of the problem, you also need the staff to operate them. Not every nurse is an ICU nurse.
So just having more doesn't mean we can use more anyway.
More respirators is only part of the problem, you also need the staff to operate them. Not every nurse is an ICU nurse.
So just having more doesn't mean we can use more anyway.
One of my links said the manufacturer will be providing training on the ventilators use to any nurses not familiar with its use.
But can you not see that your statement is as vague as the ones at your link? Is your “steady flow” one per week, 10 per week, 100 per week, 1000 per week and when is the start date precisely? How many is ”next few weeks”? Numbers and dates need to be specified — OK, they probably can’t be definite yet because of approvals etc etc but vague statements are not helpful.Not that vague, there will be a steady flow of delivery over the next few weeks until the 8k are delivered.
Same link as in my post above yours . I did think I hadn't made it clear enough that they weren’t actual ventilators .Well these could be helpful, not ventilators but could maybe help reduced the demand for them
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52087002
Whoops sorry Richard missed thatSame link as in my post above yours . I did think I hadn't made it clear enough that they weren’t actual ventilators .
Weird in Tesco yesterday. I went out to get some milk and drinks, and anything else that caught my eye from what was there. I think I went out last on Thursday, but hadn't been out since. Then Tesco was quite empty, all they had then was tape near the checkouts. Yesterday I went to walk into the Tesco, and a person on the door said that I had to join the queue of people waiting outside, which I didn't expect or notice. There was only one person waiting, but they had chequered tape on the ground at 2m intervals funnelled to two road works fences 2m from the front of the shop. We had to wait for people come out, and go in one by one. Inside there are four aisles and each was blocked so that you had to walk down the length of each aisle, and there were more tape on the floor at 2m intervals. There was part of one aisle blocked off as there were two people refilling fridges, and I had to ask one of the assistants to get me some milk.
The person on the checkout wasn't wearing gloves, more for their protection than mine, seeing as they are interacting with more people than I. Odd seeing as the lengths they have gone to in the rest of the shop. I think if I was working in that position I would have wanted gloves. Maybe they don't have gloves of course.
The food shop next door just had a sign on the window advising people about the virus and to keep your distance from other people. And that is a shop of half the size with narrower aisles. After the Tesco experience, and having got what I went out for, I didn't go into the other shop, which I would normally do.
We are living in weird times.
So is the theory going down the line of those that have had more flu vaccines are more at risk? Those that have had actual flu multiple times are more at risk? Perhaps colds too?Re my question on why some are really hit hard with this virus and others barely know they've got it, that very question was asked by Nicky Campbell ..Five Live, this morning to a doctor and the doctor said they didn't know but a research team in Australia are working on it.
They have a theory that the antibodies generated by previous 'flu viruses actually benefit this new coronavirus and they think that young children aren't succumbing to COVID-19 because they haven't got any 'flu antibodies or, at least, they've only suffered a couple of coronavirus strains whereas adults, especially the elderly have a lifetime of various antibody build up. He cited Dengue fever. An immunity builds up but it won't stop a new strain of it developing , it even makes it worse and we have a new strain of the Corono family.
I really hope this is not true as it will be twisted by the anti-vaxxers ;(.Re my question on why some are really hit hard with this virus and others barely know they've got it, that very question was asked by Nicky Campbell ..Five Live, this morning to a doctor and the doctor said they didn't know but a research team in Australia are working on it.
They have a theory that the antibodies generated by previous 'flu viruses actually benefit this new coronavirus and they think that young children aren't succumbing to COVID-19 because they haven't got any 'flu antibodies or, at least, they've only suffered a couple of coronavirus strains whereas adults, especially the elderly have a lifetime of various antibody build up. He cited Dengue fever. An immunity builds up but it won't stop a new strain of it developing , it even makes it worse and we have a new strain of the Corono family.
So is the theory going down the line of those that have had more flu vaccines are more at risk? Those that have had actual flu multiple times are more at risk? Perhaps colds too?
Logic says though that if you don't vaccinate for seasonal flu it will get you rather than Covid, so vaccination would still seem to be rather a good thing? Having said that I don't have the seasonal one.I really hope this is not true as it will be twisted by the anti-vaxxers ;(.
They won't need to be an ICU nurse, they will just need to know how to operate the ventilators.I think you missed the bit were he said "Not every nurse is an ICU nurse."
I imagine, though I don't know for certain, that those on ventilators will be in ICU, and other specialist care will be required, not simply the ability to use a ventilator.They won't need to be an ICU nurse, they will just need to know how to operate the ventilators.
They won't need to be an ICU nurse, they will just need to know how to operate the ventilators.
These aren't the ventilators that the UK manufacturers will be making they are ventilators that the government has ordered from abroad, a few weeks is a low number, obvious by definition, if it is 8, we can expect an average of 1000 ventilators a week, if it is 4, we can expect an average of 2000 a week.But can you not see that your statement is as vague as the ones at your link? Is your “steady flow” one per week, 10 per week, 100 per week, 1000 per week and when is the start date precisely? How many is ”next few weeks”? Numbers and dates need to be specified — OK, they probably can’t be definite yet because of approvals etc etc but vague statements are not helpful.
I imagine, though I don't know for certain, that those on ventilators will be in ICU, and other specialist care will be required, not simply the ability to use a ventilator.
If only it was that simple. It's not just a case of knowing how to use a ventilator. If a patient is bad enough to need a ventilator, then they need to be on an ICU or High Dependency ward and looked after by the appropriately trained staff.
The person on the checkout wasn't wearing gloves, more for their protection than mine, seeing as they are interacting with more people than I. Odd seeing as the lengths they have gone to in the rest of the shop. I think if I was working in that position I would have wanted gloves. Maybe they don't have gloves of course.
So is the theory going down the line of those that have had more flu vaccines are more at risk? Those that have had actual flu multiple times are more at risk? Perhaps colds too?
I really hope this is not true as it will be twisted by the anti-vaxxers ;(.