Has anyone else watched Thomas' video on The Cumbrian Way, not much photography, more camping and hiking related but it's well worth a watch.
View: https://youtu.be/lSnWNtM9GkE
Yeah reminds me very much of his starting days in YT land and personally for me his best. Mixing Wild Camping and photography was such a breath of fresh air in the YT landscape photography genre.That's the type of vlog that I prefer.
He lives in Canada doesn't he? Not sure how long he has lived there for but he hasn't lost his accent one bit.
I'd love the Canadian Rockies over summer/winter but the bear risk and very high tourist levels would get to me - but it's a landscape far more interesting and photogenic than our own.
Our son is presently applying for permanent residency, having worked there for a couple of years. Unfortunately he's in Whistler, which isn't the most interesting area, but still pretty good.
He can always taking up Skiing.
I reckon there are some bob on landscapes around there. For me, it looks like BC and Alberta have the landscapes that work for me. Lakes, woodland then mountains and nice summers and autumns.
He does - I asked him why on earth he'd bother with Scotland given he can get out to the Canadian mountains. His answer is "castles, Canada hasn't got castles".
I'd love the Canadian Rockies over summer/winter but the bear risk and very high tourist levels would get to me - but it's a landscape far more interesting and photogenic than our own.
I didn't see any of the former and only the latter in any numbers at Morraine Lake... going back in a few days so I'll let you know if a bear eats me. It is on a scale unlike anything in the UK and is stunningly beautiful but I think each country offers something different and the UK has some of the best landscapes in the world imo.
I've just given Thomas another chance and started watching a couple of his recent videos of him out on the field (not his camera review or home ones yet) but he seems to have been listening to the feedback and he's back to just being focused on his photography instead of being a walking billboard. There's still the obligitory Square Space ad at the begining of the video which I don't mind as it's at the start and quick but it's a huge step forward IMO.
I've just started vlogging, and so far made 3 videos.
Before today though I've already realised that a lot of Thomas' videos when he is out on his own are just that, him out on his own with no one else around, unless he chooses to be with a friend or he's on a workshop. But he doesn't have any videos of him where people he doesn't know are with him on location, and I've seen him mention a few times that he also find it really awkward when other people are about.
He goes on long hikes because that's what's gets him to new places. He's said before that he enjoys hiking and camping even without the photography.I guess that's why he goes off on long hikes sometimes to get away from the crowds and to minimise the chances of other photographers/people being at a given location he has in mind.
He can always taking up Skiing.
I reckon there are some bob on landscapes around there. For me, it looks like BC and Alberta have the landscapes that work for me. Lakes, woodland then mountains and nice summers and autumns.
I thought the actual video quality of his last vid with the Fuji X-T3 and GoPro was actually quite poor. I've never had any issues with the video quality in any of his vids, and so never even thought about it, so the dip in quality stood out.Not watched any of Thomas' videos since September but his latest video caught my eye, he's got himself a Fujifilm X-T3, as this is the big brother to the camera I'm currently using (X-T20) I shall be watching his next few videos with interest.
Not sure vlogging using his Go Pro did him justice, he's built himself quite a strong reputation and the quality of the video from the Go Pro is certainly a backward step, I can understand why he's done it though.
I thought the actual video quality of his last vid with the Fuji X-T3 and GoPro was actually quite poor. I've never had any issues with the video quality in any of his vids, and so never even thought about it, so the dip in quality stood out.
The Fuji seemed to struggle keeping focus during the video, and the GoPro was set to a very wide angle, and showed quite severe distortion at some points and seemed quite jerky, maybe because it was set to 4k. The colour grading of each video source needs work to match them too. He explained he was practising with the new set up, which would be used for trips where there would be a lot of hiking to reduce the size and weight before a trip to Nepal. I hope he got things sorted before the trip, because I would not like to go all that way, to such a beautiful place and mess up the photos or video.
With regard to the Fuji X-T3 being used for stills and video, with the GoPro also for video, if he was willing to go from FF to a crop sensor for the size and weight reduction for photos, then it would be interesting to know why he didn't just use the Canon M50 which he already uses for video, and seems to give good quality, and just add the GoPro to that. Especially if he may also have to change his processing software from Lightroom to get the most out of the X-T3 RAW files. I'm sure he knows what he is going though. Can't wait to see what pics he gets in Nepal.
We will have to wait to find out, as is latest vid was looking at, and learning from, his bad pics at home.Considering he sells his pictures, going from FF to crop and from an L series to a kit lens (however good) seems a big step backwards to me. He's now carrying more batteries which will add some weight. I wonder how much he actually saved in the long run? And more importantly was it worth it. I'd live with the weight and go for best quality.
Considering he sells his pictures, going from FF to crop and from an L series to a kit lens (however good) seems a big step backwards to me. He's now carrying more batteries which will add some weight. I wonder how much he actually saved in the long run? And more importantly was it worth it. I'd live with the weight and go for best quality.
...Considering he sells his pictures, going from FF to crop and from an L series to a kit lens (however good) seems a big step backwards to me.
I'd live with the weight and go for best quality
When he first mentioned using the Fuji camera and lenses, he said it was just for the long treks. Time will tell whether the quality is good enough from the Fuji system, but I would think for the type of photography he does, art, and sometimes printed large, it could show up any flaws in the camera or lenses more than for the average person. That he saw flaws in one of the lenses he was using wide open, shows that he is scrutinising the images he takes, as you would expect, so he may be more critical than most people. Being a landscape photographer may mean that he is not at wide apertures that often, but having a system that limits in some way, could be a problem down the line. Obviously if it turns out that he is happy enough with what he gets, then he will of course be very happy with his choices, which is what we all want to be....
Maybe because he realises that APC easily exceeds the quality his customers expect and he understands that the only people who can tell the difference in quality between APC & Full frame are some photographers, art directors and publishing professionals and they are not his target audience.
Considering he sells his pictures, going from FF to crop and from an L series to a kit lens (however good) seems a big step backwards to me. He's now carrying more batteries which will add some weight. I wonder how much he actually saved in the long run? And more importantly was it worth it. I'd live with the weight and go for best quality.
Thom seems to have gone to one post a week from two, and I don't remember him saying he was planning to do that. Just glad he's still posting though.
Thom seems to have gone to one post a week from two, and I don't remember him saying he was planning to do that. Just glad he's still posting though.
I must admit I laughed too when he said high iso 640..
What's that all about though, Lightroom must be due an update or something?640 High Iso????
Also made me laugh when a devastated Thoma realised C1 is much better than LR for fuji files.... Looks like a 5D Mark IV file
https://www.fujirumors.com/canon-sh...r-his-trip-to-nepal-and-here-is-what-he-says/
For landscape 640 is high, as Steve rightly says.I must admit I laughed too when he said high iso 640..