- Messages
- 3,536
- Name
- Spike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
If she used to shoot film then I'd be lending her a film camera
I would have to buy one for me to do that
If she used to shoot film then I'd be lending her a film camera
I wonder if anyone in this thread borrowed the screen calibrators or the film cameras that were doing the rounds on here in the not too distant past!
What a load of selfish rubbish in this thread.
She's family and asked to borrow a camera and a zoom, I'd have no hesitation in loaning it out, and would even spend an hour or two going through how to use it properly or maybe even how to look after it if they don't know.
Some things in life are more important than keeping gear in mint+++ condition.
I wonder if anyone in this thread borrowed the screen calibrators or the film cameras that were doing the rounds on here in the not too distant past!
I have let people use my equipment, I trust people but then I am a better judge of character than most.
I can't even lend anyone a DVD without it, and it's case coming back covered in scratches...
I always get stuff returned to me in a lesser state than I lend it, hence why I'd never lend kit out to anyone bar the most experienced and trusted photographer.
I hope for the OP's sake this doesn't turn into a "told you so" thread.
Exactly. The responses here just go to prove the unhealthy emotional attachment to some electronics, plastic and glass.
So you wouldn't mind sending me all your photographic gear? I'll pay the postage .
I mean, it's not like you have a unhealthy emotional attachment to it? It's only plastic and glass .
Totally different, I don't know you from Adam. .
Ah, so you do have an attachment to it then? I did think it strange that a photographer had no attachment to his (expensive) equipment that he uses for his hobby or profession.
Think this whole issue revolves around a) the value of your kit, b) how well you actually know the person making the request, c) the specific insurance cover you have for the circumstances.
Without proper and valid insurance cover there is no way I would loan £1-£3k+ worth of camera out for the day.
To a wedding would definitely be on my list of, "Sorry I can't do that" excuses I'm afraid.
I normally don't loan my gear to another person but this time I got no choice because my sis in-law wanted to borrow a camera for a day.
Of course i got bunch of lens and 2 cameras and she just wanted something small and light to use. I have gears like Grip D300, grip D7000, 70-200 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, tamron 17-50 f2.8, 35mm f1.8, 50 f1.8, 24 f2.8, 105mm f2.8.
Of course she is not borrowing my d300 due to weight and i didn't tell her i have a 70-200 and 24-70. Prime lens is big no no to her due to not zoom able.
So only my d7000 and tamron 17-50 f2.8.
Most likely the grip will be taken out and lens will be attached with the camera.
Any tips for me to loan equipment out?
Probably one of the worst places, a little jostling and a misplaced elbow and camera + lens do a drop test to the floor.
And then sister in law says "but it wasn't my fault, XXXX bumped me and he caused it to fall and smash".
So you wouldn't mind sending me all your photographic gear? I'll pay the postage .
I mean, it's not like you have a unhealthy emotional attachment to it? It's only plastic and glass .
How nice it must be to have such vast amounts of disposable money,I'm sure not everyone would be in that same position if an accident occurred with their equipment if loaned out!but they are still no more than material possessions that can be replaced tomorrow.
How nice it must be to have such vast amounts of disposable money,I'm sure not everyone would be in that same position if an accident occurred with their equipment if loaned out!
Are you my brother in law I didn't know I had?
And as I said, I have no emotional attachment to material things - cameras, guitars, bikes, cars are all things I enjoy and have an interest in but they are still no more than material possessions that can be replaced tomorrow.
When it comes down to it, material objects just aren't that important and the world would be a better place if more people felt that and got their priorities right...
I only buy what I can afford, which means I can afford to replace it.
We all have vast amounts of disposable income, if you didn't you wouldn't even be dreaming of spending £1,000s on camera gear and be more worried about having money for your next meal...
Would you loan your car out to your sister in law if you knew she wasn't insured (legal issues aside?) and was unfamiliar with driving?
I only buy what I can afford, which means I can afford to replace it.
We all have vast amounts of disposable income, if you didn't you wouldn't even be dreaming of spending £1,000s on camera gear and be more worried about having money for your next meal...
I only buy what I can afford, which means I can afford to replace it.
We all have vast amounts of disposable income, if you didn't you wouldn't even be dreaming of spending £1,000s on camera gear and be more worried about having money for your next meal...
I only buy what I can afford, which means I can afford to replace it.
We all have vast amounts of disposable income, if you didn't you wouldn't even be dreaming of spending £1,000s on camera gear and be more worried about having money for your next meal...
I'm not sure I can answer this without it seeming rude, if it does I apologise in advance as it isn't personal but I'm struggling for words.
I have news for you, "we all" dont have "vast amounts of disposable income", there was a poster on this forum a few weeks ago who posted about how he/she was searching around for coppers to go out and buy food. Many people are living at the very edge of their income at present and I deal with people every day who fear for their jobs and their savings.
In the real world 95% of people save for luxuries and it might take take them months or years to afford a £1k camera, anyone who will glibly say that they don't care about £1k of equipment as they can just replace it tomorrow is either lying, was born into a rich family and was never taught the value of money or is an investment banker or similar.
Seriously, you would feel nothing to drop £1000 tomorrow morning because your mate threw your camera in the river? Not one bit of anger or sorrow?
It is all relative. Anyone that can spend £100s or even £1,000s on luxury items has vast disposable income, it is as simple as that. You don't have to have a camera that costs loads, you don't have to have lens that cost loads and so on.
And I find the majority of responses here to show a very sad state our society is in if you can't even lend stuff to the wife of your own brother...