1. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Looking to consolidate my kit and would like a dedicated WA lens. The widest lens I have at the moment is the Nikon 16-85mm but am looking to replace this with a dedicated WA lens. The lenses I have narrowed it down to are:
    1. Tokina 12-24mm f4
    2. Sigma 10-20mm
    3. Nikon 12-24mm
    4. Tamron 10-20mm

    Which would you choose and why. I would mainly be using for cityscapes,landscapes and groups of people.
    Thanks for your help
     
  2. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,663
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Of that list, I'd probably opt for the Sigma but would have suggested you put the Tokina 11-16 or 11-20 on the short list too. I've not used the latter but the 11-16 is fantastic. If the 11-20 is the same but with a bit more range, it'll be fantastic.
     
  3. Nod

    Nod Kronus

    Messages:
    30,172
    Name:
    Nod (NOT Ethel!!!)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Assuming (dangerous, I know!) that you're using a Dx body, I'd go for the Sigma - and the older version at that. Allegedly sharper and undoubtedly cheaper on the 2nd hand shelves than the newer fixed aperture version. I know it's slightly slower in terms of maximum aperture than the latest constant (f/3.5) aperture version but that's (IMO) of marginal value when using an ultra wide angle lens.
     
  4. michael23

    michael23

    Messages:
    13,866
    Name:
    michael (Laura)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I have used the variable aperture sigma 10-20 and its been a great lens. Very good value on the second hand market too.
     
  5. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,663
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Although worth noting the benefits of a wide aperture if the OP shoots starry skies. Otherwise, inclined to agree.
     
    Nod likes this.
  6. Nod

    Nod Kronus

    Messages:
    30,172
    Name:
    Nod (NOT Ethel!!!)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    For that, I bought a Tamron 14mm f/2.8 to supplement my Sigma 12-24 for use on FF.
     
  7. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The reason I left out the 11-16 was the range was a bit short
     
  8. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes you are correct I’m a DX shooter with a D7000
     
  9. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,663
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    11-20?
     
  10. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Looks like I may start looking at the variable aperture Sigma. If they are relatively cheap it seems like a no brainer. If I’m not happy with it, will not hopefully have cost me too much and can sell it favour of something else
     
    michael23 likes this.
  11. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks for your input guys
     
  12. Nawty

    Nawty

    Messages:
    6,109
    Name:
    Ned
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just picking up on one of your earlier points, UWA lenses for big groups of people is generally a very bad idea as you will get nasty face/body distortions at the edges.
     
  13. Teflon-Mike

    Teflon-Mike

    Messages:
    972
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Similar deliberation a couple of years ago, I plumped for the Sigma 8-16... if you gonna go wide, may as well go all the way! Its an annoying trait of UWA's is that once you get some, it's never really enough.

    Probably not the wisest choice, it was twice the price of the rest, and rather wobbly at the very wide side... 'tis W--I--D--E though! Great for getting into confined spaces and not chopping things of the edge of the frame.

    Out of the more conservative alternatives; the Siggy 10-20 though has to be top-choice for VFM. And probably the older f4.5 rather than later f3.5. If second hand or you can find old-stock. Its reputedly a slightly better lens optically, and cheaper, and when you have such incredibly closest focus and deep DoF anyway from such short lens, the extra stop of aperture doesn't 'really' make that much odds, just a brighter view-finder. Tameron compares very closely in reviews, but seems a slightly more 'budget' offering.

    Nikon 12-24, is good, but expensive. Tokina 12-24 is very good budget rival to the Nikon, and apparently very very well regarded for IQ for the money; B-U-T neither go that bit wider, and on a crop-sensor camera, when you get down to these short focal lengths, 1mm does make a big difference to the amount of wide you get. So Siggy 10-20, has to take the cherry on all round points.

    But be warned..... Tele's serve up instant impact, cut clutter and concentrate viewers attention, very easily. Go wide? Everything gets compressed, and impact and drama diminish, and they all start to make you have to work an awful lot harder to get what you expect or hope for, and dodge both distortion and 'wired' perspective; Packing so much in the frame, the devil is in the detail, and there's often a LOT of it to have to look at, and its 'small' and distracting day-glo blobs of dog harnesses or crisp-packets and things you don't 'see' in the view-finder during composition, can leap out when you look at the image on a 17" monitor.
     
  14. LongLensPhotography

    LongLensPhotography

    Messages:
    12,997
    Name:
    Truth Teller
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I had Tokina 12-24. Pretty decent lens. Nikon version I heard is a little bit better still.

    I really really didn't like the antiquated old Sigma. If it is not ART branded I wouldn't touch it.
     
  15. Doti B

    Doti B

    Messages:
    52
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks for all the advice. Guess what came across what looks to be an excellent deal on a used Tokina 11-16mm. I know it a short zoom range but at the price bring asked it’s a no brainer. The price is almost too good to be true.....let’s hope this does indeed come to fruition
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice