- Messages
- 7,331
- Edit My Images
- No
I know ultimately there isn't a right answer, but I am in Paris next week and will have just one day free when I can do some sightseeing. My hotel is near Le Louvre (probably irrelevant!!).
I have a Canon 5D3 (full frame) and I was planning on just taking the 24-70mm f/2.8.
My question is, does anybody think it will be worth lugging around the 16-35 f/2.8 as well? I was going to leave the flash at home. I don't usually photograph cities and I've only ever driven through Paris before, so any advice is welcome.
Another thought is that I could borrow a 24-105 f/4 instead of the 24-70 but I think the f/2.8 might be handier than the extra length.
I have a Canon 5D3 (full frame) and I was planning on just taking the 24-70mm f/2.8.
My question is, does anybody think it will be worth lugging around the 16-35 f/2.8 as well? I was going to leave the flash at home. I don't usually photograph cities and I've only ever driven through Paris before, so any advice is welcome.
Another thought is that I could borrow a 24-105 f/4 instead of the 24-70 but I think the f/2.8 might be handier than the extra length.
It won't be easy, as I don't like to be parted from it, but I have a Canon G15 and think perhaps this is a better idea. I wish I had a spare battery, but it does seem to last for ages and maybe I'll take the charger just in case. I might even have a play with some of it's features that I never use - like movie digest.