Recent content by RedTele

Just my 2p. My Panasonic FT2 kept fogging up when I went skiing last year and it died when I went swimming with it in Portugal this summer. Their toughness is questionable. As for take anywhere cam, I just got myself an S100. Brand new for £199 from WEX which I think is a great deal.

Love #1, reminds me of when I went there as a kid and my family's car got swamped by about 20 of them! Superb composition, the balance between the subjects and the background is perfect. Others are great too. #4 is my second favourite. I dislike the vignetting on these photos they're too much...

Hi guys, I'm looking for a camera bag that can hold - 5D2 + 24-105 in safety - macbook pro 13" - lecture notes in A4 ringbinder - miscellaneous items, lunch and - can be worn comfortably while riding a bike - not ridiculously large - doesn't scream super nerdy camera bag The...

Listing what you have currently would help.

For landscape where high ISO doesn't really matter 20D is more than capable. I took some great photos with the 30D 18-55 IS combo recently. Where I didn't have wide enough view I just took several frames and stitched it together in post. Worked really well; do four put it together et voila you...

ah ok thought it was too good to be true!

If it's got good optics and reasonably priced people will buy it. Think 70-200 F2.8 IS vs the F4 IS, though in that case there's a more obvious size difference too. It's still considerably smaller than both the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 24-105 IS. If it's £799 launch it'll hopefully be sub £500 after...

Yes it will almost certainly be a downgrade in quality.

I feel for you but I did have a good laugh reading your post :lol: it's the way you wrote it

Haven't read the entire thread but... Crop sensor does not magnify anything. It's a cropped image of a FF sensor. I know what you meant but hey. 70-200 f/2.8 is not any smaller than 100-400 it's about the same size. Weighs quite a bit. f/4 versions are much smaller and feels about half...

So I had a play with this at a local store today. First impression: it's much smaller than expected. The camera body itself is no bigger than most compacts. It felt smaller even compared with the NEX because of the lack of grip (not a plus imo I'd rather have a firm hold). What I did not...

Sony NEX5N - 110.8x58.8x38.2 Canon G12 - 112x76x48 I think it can be done (if Canon wants to that is!).

err, no :lol: Why would you stick on the EF-M mount and not have an APS-C sensor in there? I thought that was implied. 18-55mm IS EFM lens on a G12 body, giving 28.8-88mm. I'd prefer something like 15-50 IS powerzoom, would be even better. I would love an OVF/EVF but that would add to the bulk +...

I see the EOS M as a missed opportunity... If they just took the Canon G12 body, stuck on the EF-M mount and taken off the optical VF that'd have been an awesome small package and I'd have been very tempted.

Any examples we could look at? You're getting blurry shots at shutter speed 1/400 or ISO400?