Recent content by SBPhoto

I bought the 16-35 f4 over the 16-35 f2.8 because is was better value for money. but the 2.8 does have slightly better quality but no IS. You can see the test chart comparison here ISO I have the 24-70 f2.8 MKII and its a great standard reach lens (if thats what you need). Though I do miss the...

That sounds complicated. Wish you good luck with that, im sure people would be interested to know how you get on though.

HI Hanley, great shot, great work on removing distractions (and bollards and signs). I would definitely work on the verticals even a bit. I did 20 second effort on your image in Photoshop (just to make sure it would look ok before i commented) and, in my opinion it make it better, speaking for...

Lovely image Dave, lots to like about it. The tree is beautiful and pin sharp. The moon is perfectly placed for me, in the gap of branches. Love the tones and the birds. Tree is nicely off centre, i might have made it a little more off centre, personal choice. The only thing i would do is make...

As others have said both very pleasing images, great foreground interest and leading lines. I havent read everyones comments but I like on the first one how the 'mountain' for want of a better word, it puffing out the clouds from its top. The second one is nicely balanced with the trees, and a...

I love trees, a lot. This is a beautiful tree and a great subject. I much prefer the second one because it has less distractions and a misty look. I think you could get a bit more out of the dynamic range, and it needs to have a straight horizon. Was this straight out of the camera?