What an utter waste of life

Brazo said:
The intent comes from purposeful driving the wrong way, I’ll be honest I have no intention of arguing with you, I’ve said my opinion and you’ve said yours which I respect . I’m simply not interested in debating which ‘opinion’ is better.
Click to expand...
My bold. WeIl,I think that's the best option for you, tbh because by saying what you have just confirms my belief that you don't fully understand what the discussion is about. So that you aren't left wondering ,I'll explain it. It's different to what I've said before and is focussed on what you've just said. The 'intent' is not, in this case, about deliberately driving the wrong way on a carriageway but the act of killing someone as a result of it. Two completely separate issues. As ever, I'm open to being shown that I'm wrong and will acknowledge that and in that spirit I hoped that Garry, who clearly has a very detailed knowledge of law, would pass comment which he has. I'd have thought those comments would have been enough for you to reconsider your understanding of the actual issue. Sadly, I see you have an ally in Cambsno, who, I'm sure, will have read Garry's comments, too but still fails to grasp what the issue is.
 
It seems to me that what we have here is a few straightforward people who have different opinions, each of which is valid, and none of us is about to change our mind.

But perhaps I could add something to the mix?
Brazo said:
The intent comes from purposeful driving the wrong way, I’ll be honest I have no intention of arguing with you, I’ve said my opinion and you’ve said yours which I respect . I’m simply not interested in debating which ‘opinion’ is better.
Click to expand...
That's not how I see it. Obviously, deliberately driving the wrong way is a criminal act, and extremely irresponsible. But it could never amount to intent to kill, because it's obvious to everyone that if the intent to kill was there there would also have to be an intent to both commit suicide and to kill everyone else in the same car.

So, logic tells us that there was an intent to do something - to be totally stupid and irresponsible, to commit one or more criminal acts, perhaps to make themselves look big on social media, but not to kill themselves or to kill other people.

Not that I pretend to understand how these people think, assuming that they do, and, as I see it, that's the problem - they live in their own world.
 
JohnC6 said:
My bold. WeIl,I think that's the best option for you, tbh because by saying what you have just confirms my belief that you don't fully understand what the discussion is about. So that you aren't left wondering ,I'll explain it. It's different to what I've said before and is focussed on what you've just said. The 'intent' is not, in this case, about deliberately driving the wrong way on a carriageway but the act of killing someone as a result of it. Two completely separate issues. As ever, I'm open to being shown that I'm wrong and will acknowledge that and in that spirit I hoped that Garry, who clearly has a very detailed knowledge of law, would pass comment which he has. I'd have thought those comments would have been enough for you to reconsider your understanding of the actual issue. Sadly, I see you have an ally in Cambsno, who, I'm sure, will have read Garry's comments, too but still fails to grasp what the issue is.
Click to expand...
John not everyone has time like you to argue rubbish to the nth degree. You don’t need to worry about my opinion and I don’t need to worry about yours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top