Surely you’d be aware of that, it also has judges, juries and quire a few saints judging by quite a few recent threads.Didn't know tp had so many trained crash investigators who've seen all the evidence first hand..
Congratulations, but being there doesn't make you an expert.
Indeed. The rail unions have a notoriously poor grip on reality.Incredible how people are calling for Andy Hill's punishment, yet the rail unions call a strike because a driver has been reassigned after allegedly going through 3 red signals...
Unions in general I’m afraid.Indeed. The rail unions have a notoriously poor grip on reality.
shoot him
Update: Not guilty.
Andy Hill's defence, which the jury bought, was that he had experienced "cognitive impairment" - in other words, a black out - at the time of the crash, which was brought on by hypoxia possibly due to the effects of the G forces.
Some of the bereaved relatives commented that this creates a worrying precedent. I think I agree.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-47495885
I'd suggest that people being killed by aircraft crashing on them should perhaps come a bit lower down the list of things we need.This is totally wrong - the last thing we need are air-shows having more restrictions or being banned, or just seeing planes fly in a straight line.
Personally I think it was the wrong decision he took it on himself to carry out questionable stunts in an old crate over areas contains people going about their daily business . For me now that's it all demonstrations of this type need to be either over sea areas or just canned all together.
Don't they have the planes flying over the car parks? They have done at the Festival of Speed for a good few years now and access is always closed to the car parks whilst the planes carry out their display.Even last year's Goodwood Revival air display was no more because in the past the aircraft used to fly over the crowds..
Yes you can, and you should. That's how aviation safety works. Every time something goes seriously wrong, the experts work out how to prevent it going wrong again in future. But the key is defining the "something" that you ban as narrowly as possible. The AAIB have made 32 very specific recommendations to improve safety in the wake of the Shoreham crash: which ones do you think are unreasonable?You cant look to ban something on the back of one event.
Yes you can, and you should. That's how aviation safety works. Every time something goes seriously wrong, the experts work out how to prevent it going wrong again in future. But the key is defining the "something" that you ban as narrowly as possible. The AAIB have made 32 very specific recommendations to improve safety in the wake of the Shoreham crash: which ones do you think are unreasonable?
Nobody here was suggesting that.I am referring as to the 'ban airshows' statements.
Nobody here was suggesting that.
Personally I think it was the wrong decision he took it on himself to carry out questionable stunts in an old crate over areas contains people going about their daily business . For me now that's it all demonstrations of this type need to be either over sea areas or just canned all together.
Personally I think it was the wrong decision he took it on himself to carry out questionable stunts in an old crate over areas contains people going about their daily business . For me now that's it all demonstrations of this type need to be either over sea areas or just canned all together.
Yes you can, and you should. That's how aviation safety works. Every time something goes seriously wrong, the experts work out how to prevent it going wrong again in future. But the key is defining the "something" that you ban as narrowly as possible. The AAIB have made 32 very specific recommendations to improve safety in the wake of the Shoreham crash: which ones do you think are unreasonable?
Not really comparable. 2x crashes in relative short period killing upwards of 150 people each time and a potential issue with a certain version of a plane, compared to a single vintage jet which as some have already said have much more strict safety checks.
Not really comparable. 2x crashes in relative short period killing upwards of 150 people each time and a potential issue with a certain version of a plane, compared to a single vintage jet which as some have already said have much more strict safety checks.
Err no just stupid points.you will disagree with your own shadow you.