Please don't insult us by using that as a justification to trespass on private property.
Images tucked away on small niche websites have nothing to do with saving our history or heritage.
In case you have misread the first time, and the second time (if you actually bothered to read it :|) I'll clarify for you again what tresspass actually means, in Law :|
Tresspass is a civil offence, not a criminal one. You can only be sued (not prosecuted) by the landowner and no one else, whatever they may say. That is the law.
Are you telling me that you've never, ever wondered what's over there? or
even gone to have a look at something maybe you shouldn't? I doubt that very much. Everyone is inquisitive at some point in their lives.
Strangely enough, there are thousands and thousands of people who do exactly the same thing as I do. Google Urban Exploration and you'll find all the websites that are dedicated to UE.
FYI, the reason I am into UE is to document history and heritage. Take the Clipstone Headstocks, New Clipstone, Nottinghamshire. They are the second highest headstocks in the world. The local councillor wants to get them de-listed so they can be demolished. I'm one of the hundreds of people that want them to stay and actively campaign to save them. And that's only one of a few things.
Whatever other peoples reasons are for UE, that is my reason. I don't break into sites, I walk in through open windows and open doors, as do other likeminded people. I am also a law student, so know exactly what my rights are, as do other people. Breaking and entering is a criminal offence, tresspass is not.
Does that make it any clearer?
Sal