- Messages
- 241
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
What do people like and whats good and not
Thanks
Thanks
Same applications surely means it's the same difference. Everything else is down to personal preference. I use both. Prefer OS X as it can deal with 4K screens much better by scaling the UI elements without scaling the picture window. Besides that no real difference.
I suppose the next question Macbook or Imac or Mini Mac with a very good monitor
I suppose the next question Macbook or Imac or Mini Mac with a very good monitor
You edit from memory? Wow!I think IPS Monitors are good for editing from memory.
although the apple store dont run dell screensMy advice go to a store and try both systems out. Take memory stick and look at both systems. In the end it's what suits you
personally glossy screens give me a headache (no matter what platform).What is good for one isn't right for another. Best to try before you buy.
You edit from memory? Wow!
Not necessarily so when you compare like for like. It maybe if certain components aren't important to you and you are willing to compromise so it fits your requirements. A comment so often made but I've never ever been able to spec up an equivalent significantly cheaper.you get better bang for your buck hardware specification wise if you choose pc.
Exactly and as you say whilst there was a saving it was at the cost of something. Whether that something is worth it is a very individual decision to which there couldn't possibly be a blanket answer.
Its not its not just about spec it's how the hardware handles it a PC with 16gb of ram will perform like a Mac with 8gb)
I use Kubuntu on my PC, and performance is excellent and and the price was a long way below the poorest spec Mac price. There's not just Windows out there.Its not its not just about spec it's how the hardware handles it a PC with 16gb of ram will perform like a Mac with 8gb you cannot compare them like for like. Financially the Mac is actually better value by the time you get a windows based machine up to the same performance. (Note performance not spec!) At the end of the day they will both edit photos and video, but macs in all their forms are generally designed and built better than windows based machines.
agreed, I'd also like to see that. dealing with macbooks pros side by side with my same/similar spec M3800 I'd take that claim with a large pinch of salt.Got any supporting evidence for that claim?
As I said I tried to buy a Windows based laptop to try and save money. I tested the best available from several manufacturers and none could match the MacBook Pro.( even at the same and higher price)I'm not some sort of Windows hater. I require the best tools for the job and the Mac is it.Got any supporting evidence for that claim?
I think people can use what they are happier using. Windows, Mac, Linux or whatever. There is no best one for everyone. They all have their differences, and their fanboys who will be busy convincing themselves.What do people like and whats good and not
Thanks
As I said I tried to buy a Windows based laptop to try and save money. I tested the best available from several manufacturers and none could match the MacBook Pro.( even at the same and higher price)I'm not some sort of Windows hater. I require the best tools for the job and the Mac is it.
The best portable computer to run Windows on is... A Macbook Pro.
http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/macbook-pro-declared-best-performing-windows-laptop/
Have they put a matte screen on it yet?
I hate editing on on glossy screens, bleurgh.
Still glossy, but not as much as the non-retina displays. It's fairly easy to adjust the ambient lighting to prevent glare/reflection.