because digging oil up is really safe and good for the environment.
Electricity grid infrastructure is already built for distribution. Electricity can be generated locally via roof-top solar. It doesn't require discovery or any form of mining. Even better than fossil fuel, electricity can be easily converted to all other form of energy.I fail to see how you can say the quoted statement.As is often the case, the energy needs to be transportable, which is why fossil fuels have remained dominant for so long, easily discovered, refined and transported relatively safely from one location to another.
Where are we (planet Earth not just a few houses in the UK) going to get all this extra electricity from, solar isnt going to work unless there is massive investment in new infrastructure. Hence my quote why fossil fuel has dominated.Electricity grid infrastructure is already built for distribution. Electricity can be generated locally via roof-top solar. It doesn't require discovery or any form of mining. Even better than fossil fuel, electricity can be easily converted to all other form of energy.I fail to see how you can say the quoted statement.
Just add localised demand smoothing batteries and we are golden. That will allow us to use our existing infrastructure and all forms of renewable energy to their full potential. Current grid is built to meet peak demand, there's loads of room to charge batteries during low demand, allowing us to use more at any time without expensive infrastructure upgrade.
And have you studied that image? 2030 projection is that we only needs that tiny amount of solar PV.
because digging oil up is really safe and good for the environment.
Your off your rocker if you actually think EVs will damage the environment more than oil ever has in its entire lifetime.
Low cost EV for city dwellers.
https://www.dezeen.com/2018/11/23/biomega-electric-car-sin-design-technology/amp/
Since when was €20k low cost?
Somehow I think you will find you get a lot more car for your money with a Fiesta.List price for a Fiesta auto is £17,395 OTR. What's that in Euros? (ZDnG is the unique vehicle code that Ford's site gives me.)
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/273447359504When they had to leave the doors off in order to keep the cost down. Renault Twizy for €20k anyone?
Imagine blocking London's streets with this
https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...9-Derelict-ICON-electric-car-conversion-Tesla
And not having to pay the congestion charge.
Ford started similar action 18 months ago, but without the need to close US factories.GM moving away from conventional cars focuses on its line-up of trucks, electric and self-driving vehicles.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46350057
Ford started similar action 18 months ago, but without the need to close US factories.
The main reason for the low rating is lack of luggage space due having only been available as a saloon and the battery taking up some of the boot space. This has been addressed on the facelift model with the addition of an estate model.Yeah you needed to badly this attempt is absolute garbage
https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/reviews/ford/mondeo/hybrid/review
Why not in UK? Are Ford only producing hybrids and EV to meet US government compliance? Why are Ford still lagging behind in global EV market?Ford have various hybrids in America and have had for quite a few years.
Because the size of the market hasn't made it worthwhile. Much easier and cost effective to let everyone else iron out the pitfalls and increase battery life then step in.Why not in UK? Are Ford only producing hybrids and EV to meet US government compliance? Why are Ford still lagging behind in global EV market?
It appears the car industry is a race to the bottom. Whoever gets there first looses, everyone is happy pushing out tiny evolutionary products "CO2 emission reduced by 5% in this year's model". If it wasn't for Tesla, we'd still be driving mild-hybrids worse than Toyota from 20 years ago.
*Sigh* your trickery by disguising as Google news link fouled me to click it.Because the size of the market hasn't made it worthwhile. Much easier and cost effective to let everyone else iron out the pitfalls and increase battery life then step in.
https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEKXijUOFcRfg_wk6bxD1u2kqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow9935CjCe0eYCMNLmzAU?hl=en-GB&gl=GB&ceid=GB:en
Ford EV 's are in development much like other manufacturers, they are on track to have an EV SUV with a 300 mile range by 2020 and will have 40 EV models globally by 2022, so some will arrive earlier.Let's hope traditional car companies can move as fast as you said. But I doubt it in Ford's case, where are their upcoming EV's? Most other manufacturer have multiple EV coming out by 2020.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...hey-still-arent-moving-fast-enough-2018-11-27
The problem is customer education. The size of market is small because dealers aren't pushing people towards greener vehicles. Unfortunately dealers are only paid by the number of cars they sell. So they sell the vehicle that requires the least amount of effort to them, rather than the most suitable vehicle for an individual. Only way to go into a dealership and end up with EV is to say "I want an EV" to begin with. That is why size of the market seems small right now.
As already answered above. Market not big enough to make worthwhile. Battery range not big enough to make worthwhile.Why are ford so late to the party in the UK? Plenty of other big manufacturers have EVs available NOW.
That argument is b*****ks. Sure the initial energy used to produce the battery may be high, but over it's life time that will cancel itself out.So you agree that eV battery production is probably more damaging than driving a diesel then?
Go back and read my previous posts that I'm referring to. Im not just talking about energy.That argument is b*****ks. Sure the initial energy used to produce the battery may be high, but over it's life time that will cancel itself out.
Unlike ICE cars where you have that initial energy consumption in the building of that ICE. You have to factor in the energy used to drill, transport, refine, transport every single litre of fuel that ICE is going to use it's entire life.
Even when you factor in the energy used to make the electricity for the EV it's still more than a 50% reduction in natural resources consumed over the life time of the car.
In keeping with their products then.A standard 7kW charger will be available for free, but drivers will have to pay for a faster service.
In keeping with their products then.
"Value" and "finest"
If you are a woman, maybe. I am in and out in about 10 minutes, there is no way on earth I am going to prolong going to a supermarket because I need to recharge a car.Great marketing for them, stay longer and get free leccy and now other supermarkets will be forced to follow suit.
Whilst GM are going to be making a sizeable portion of their workforce redundant, Ford will be moving some of their workforce about to where it's needed and no one has to lose their jobs.GM moving away from conventional cars focuses on its line-up of trucks, electric and self-driving vehicles.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46350057
Seems like GM never learnt their lessons from when the hard to file for bankruptcy and take government bailouts several years ago.
And sabotage deals to prevent SAAB from going bankrupt. Gits.