Dev or scanning issue??

Messages
11,034
Name
Suz
Edit My Images
Yes
Just got the scans back from the Silbersalz I sent to AW. A couple of them have weird sludgy marks. This one shows it the best. Any ideas what caused this? It's not on every shot but a few other have a 'grubby' look as well. All taken on the Pentax 17. I've never used ECN2 film before. The area above left dragon seems to have dirty brown marks.

0036.jpg
 
Another weird mark on this one. Pale rather than brown. Bottom bit of big cloud just above the tall tree.

0037.jpg
 
Impossible to tell without seeing the negatives, but given the similar placement in all of them I'd wager it's a scanning issue.
 
The marks look a pale blue to me
first horizontal
second two vertical, left and center
third horizontal (looks like some kind of writing)
 
AW have rescanned them all. Interestingly there is now some noticeable banding on some instead. Very odd. Others have a couple of band lines but this one has lots.

0076-6505b.jpeg
 
AW have rescanned them all. Interestingly there is now some noticeable banding on some instead. Very odd. Others have a couple of band lines but this one has lots.

View attachment 482076
I wonder if there was residue present and on some the cleaning has resulted in smears? It doesn't look like scanner banding, which would be straight.
 
I wonder if there was residue present and on some the cleaning has resulted in smears? It doesn't look like scanner banding, which would be straight.

It's a mystery really. There's marks on others in lines but they are pairs or triples not all over so much of the scan.
 
Does Silbersalz film still have the remjet on ? The artefacts look as if they may be caused by less-than-perfect removal of the remjet. I experienced this problem myself when developing Vision 3 films and removing the remjet myself.

It does have the remjet layer. Have a second roll so undecided whether to use that and send it to a different lab or not.
 
I contacted AW again about the weird marks on the above re-scanned ones. They have refunded half the cost of processing as a goodwill gesture.

So looks the answer is in fact - both! It was a dev and scanning issue as they hadn't done either properly :(
 
Back
Top