Nice idea but in reality people are saving too much, the price differences are too big to ignore and not everyone has a local shop, it grudges some on here that don't live in the real world as you've read but that's the reality
hi again there are savings but I recently looked at digital rev for a sigma 105mm and the cost is only £ 20.00 less than uk and I don't get panamoz there prices don't stack up either for me, I just wonder if people would love there import savings so much if they had a problem with the item ie in need of repair can anyone add there after sales experiences to the threadNice idea but in reality people are saving too much, the price differences are too big to ignore and not everyone has a local shop, it grudges some on here that don't live in the real world as you've read but that's the reality
I'm not the only one making jibes am I? I just give back what I get.I'm well aware where the onus is, in most cases it's the seller not the buyer as suggested in some earlier comments. When it is the buyer the.sellers normally state they are not responsible for any import /tax duties.Not really, there's plenty of examples on here where that's not the case and do you really need to keep attacking people with your pathetic little jibes?
As has been repeatedly explained to you, the onus is on the person importing in most grey import scenarios, that is not an argument for or against importing and merely a statement of fact.
Your theory is not supported by the facts, however. Most "grey" prices are actually HIGHER than mainstream UK prices once you strip out the import duty and VAT elements. If retailers in Hong Kong do indeed benefit from lower overheads, then they're making big fat margins by selling to the UK. And why not? They have a massive price advantage over UK retailers (20% for cameras, 28% for lenses) automatically built in by evading tax, so they don't need to shave their prices to the bone. People who buy grey here might well be subsidising consumers in Hong Kong.I think a lot of the difference is made up through the import route, if you buy a canon camera from a UK seller that camera has been imported by Canon UK who have there own offices and staff (who have overheads) they then sell on to a reseller (who also have overheads and need to make some profit) these resellers then sell on to the UK retail outlets who will then add on there little bit of profit. Now if you buy Grey your canon dealer and reseller are based in hk and will naturally have lower overheads and can then change lower prices for the same overall profit
That's a fair summary, Bill.If the new camera/lens, (a standard rate VAT item), comes into the UK/EU from a non-EU country, VAT and Duty, (if applicable), must be paid by someone - i.e. by the eventual end user
It is as simple as that .......... if you buy a new camera you must by law pay VAT ........ either through a charge from the VAT registered seller or through the correct customs declaration.
If Customs and Excise, (HMRC if you like), follow the paperwork through, if VAT has not been paid on the item you will be charged VAT, Duty, a fee plus interest on the amount.
If they feel that you knowingly did not pay VAT you may be charged an additional penalty.
As long a you know this you can make a decision as to what to do .......... we live in a democracy and there is little that is being done at the present time to stop you or (some) importers, breaking the law.
(I am surprised that the large courier firms are turning a blind eye to this)
I would imagine that the courier is also only going to insure the package up to the value stated, so if it gets lost in transit it is the sender that loses. Anther reason why the courier wouldn't care particularly as this would reduce their risk even further.That's a fair summary, Bill.
I used to be surprised that the large courier firms turn a blind eye to it, but I'm not any more. If a retailer in (say) HK declares on the customs documents that it's a low value item, that's none of the courier's business. They're just paid to transport it, and they're not responsible for the accuracy of the documents. Plus, it's simply not in their interest. They must make money out of shipping stuff from HK to the UK, and why would they want to put that at risk?
I would imagine that the courier is also only going to insure the package up to the value stated, so if it gets lost in transit it is the sender that loses. Anther reason why the courier wouldn't care particularly as this would reduce their risk even further.
Absolutely. For example, my DPD international tariff says that they'll normally only pay £100 in the event of loss, and if I want to cover the full value for the parcel it will cost me 1% of its value. So obviously, in the long run it doesn't make sense to pay for the enhanced cover unless they're losing more than 1 in 100 parcels, and of course the actual loss rate is far far below that.I ship a lot (in the UK) and loss/damage seems to be fairly rare, I wouldn't be surprised if they'd lose more money paying for extra compensation on every package than just replacing lost/damaged items.
French VAT (TVA) is 20%, the same as the UK.......German and French VAT rates are slightly below the UK .....
......but it is also happening in France and Germany
Are you bad at reading or just thick? You, the buyer,the importer are totally and utterly responsible for declaring goods that you are importing.Whether that be a camera,a lens, clothing,food stuffs or used Afghan jock straps.If they say they do pay then you have to take their word as true and its not your responsibility.
hi this is the last comment from me, what about resale of grey imports, I was told that uk retail outlets don't generally allow trade in on the grey imports, so does that affect resale if you sell your import later. I see on here and ebay etc that question asked many times is it a grey import? so if it does affect resale does that not kill the saving made in the first place? sorry about that guys but I just think people should make there purchase wherever and not wind people up on here.
French VAT (TVA) is 20%, the same as the UK
It certainly happens in France and the consumer/purchaser is more aware of it as a copy of the import documents are sent to the purchaser by the French customs agency.
Bob
It could also have the opposite effect, driving down the price of UK sourced S/H items. How often do you see the comment "one sold for £xxx last week". The fact that the one that sold last week was grey as opposed to the one selling this week does not make much difference to the buyer if there is no warranty left.On here it'll hurt the value slightly but I don't see many people caring about it on ebay, if you're only concerned about the price and condition why would you care where it was sourced from?
If you look on ebay most the retailers state that they are not responsible for tax and import duties so if you buy from them your obviously going to get a bill before its delivered which means its not going to be any cheaper, so how those other retailers sell at those reduced prices and you still don't get that bill I have really know idea. Whether they really do pay their tax and import duties or not is questionable and nobody on here knows either. Either way if they don't they are good at it and HMRC are unaware so your not going to get them sending you a bill or knocking on your door. If they say they do pay then you have to take their word as true and its not your responsibility.
I'm sure the existence of grey imports hurts second hand values.
Let's face it, what might be deemed to be a fair price for a second hand item can only be judged in the context of what a new one costs. If a new lens costs say £1000, people might be prepared to pay £800 for a used one in good condition. But if the new lens can be bought for only £850 via an illegal import, then some people wouldn't want to pay £800 for a used one, regardless of whether the used one is legal or illegal. Simple as that.
It's not a camera problem though is it,grey or illegal imports go way beyond cameras to the point them being a tiny percentage. Where there's people there's greed and.money it will never end grey import cameras are nothing in the scale of things
I think @rob-nikon is correct. Photographic equipment is almost unique in terms of its attractiveness for illegal imports. Cameras and lenses are the same all over the world; they're (mostly) small and valuable; lots of buyers upgrade regularly; and many buyers own multiple items of equipment. I can't think of anything else that ticks all those boxes.One reason why this issue applies to the photographic industry is cameras/lenses are very small, high end, expensive commodities that can easily and relatively cheaply be shipped around the world. Just think how many cameras/lens can fit in a container/aircraft hold compared to similar priced items like sofas and dining tables. There is also the relatively short life of a cameras before the must have next 'upgrade' model comes out 1-2 years later.
I think @rob-nikon is correct. Photographic equipment is almost unique in terms of its attractiveness for illegal imports. Cameras and lenses are the same all over the world; they're (mostly) small and valuable; lots of buyers upgrade regularly; and many buyers own multiple items of equipment. I can't think of anything else that ticks all those boxes.
If they say they do pay then you have to take their word as true and its not your responsibility.
Are you bad at reading or just thick? You, the buyer,the importer are totally and utterly responsible for declaring goods that you are importing.Whether that be a camera,a lens, clothing,food stuffs or used Afghan jock straps.
Would be great if I had a local camera shop. Nearest about 30miles away
Would be great if I had a local camera shop. Nearest about 30miles away