1. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Hey everyone

    So I’m trying my hand at some night portraits but I’m struggling a little, here 2 shots one edited one not. I’m not happy about the noise. Iv been shooting with a 35mm 1.8

    Edited one
    https://flic.kr/p/2bgFFuv

    None edited
    https://flic.kr/p/2ab5xAA

    As you can see my iso is crazy high

    Also I have a question
    If I shoot in 1.8 will I still get all of my model in focus? I know I could have tried this however this is me reflecting back once home

    Thanks for any help
     
  2. j07cmt

    j07cmt

    Messages:
    311
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    At f1.8, you will have less of the subject in focus.
     
  3. Phil V

    Phil V

    Messages:
    21,699
    Name:
    Phil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Well I wouldn’t care about the noise, they’re simply not sharp. The guy isn’t in focus.

    At 3.2 you cant get his foot and his face in focus. And except for very rare occasions we focus on the eyes. Yes I’d have shot at 1.4 and not cared that his foot and the scooter were OoF.
     
  4. Phil V

    Phil V

    Messages:
    21,699
    Name:
    Phil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just to add... if its sharp and interesting, no one will care about the noise. Asit is, only you care about the noise, everyone else will say it’s blurred.
     
  5. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes that’s what I thought.. so what can I do to get less noise and get all of him in focus if I wanted to.. I get that only his foot is and that was my intention
     
  6. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry I should have added that was my intention in the first place to get only his foot in focus.. my lens only goes to 1.8
     
  7. Phil V

    Phil V

    Messages:
    21,699
    Name:
    Phil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Ok, it might have been your intention, but it doesn’t (ok rarely) work.

    People react to peoples faces, more importantly, even if a ‘face’ is in focus and the eyes aren’t, it makes an image uncomfortable.

    In answer to your questions - what noise?

    And yes you could use 1.8

    Edit... put another way, if only the shoe is in focus, it’s not a portrait, it’s a picture of a shoe.

    And if you want it to be ‘a picture of a shoe’ then a shallower DoF to knock out the face even more would be the technique to use.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2018
  8. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    3,014
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Echoing what's been said already, noise isn't an issue for me either, it's the fact that the face is OOF.

    The only way to modify your depth of field by keeping the same aperture is with focal length (which you can't change on a prime) and distance (which will change the image because... you're in a different place...). You can see how much DoF you've got looking at the gravel. If you want both in focus and a similar frame of view, you'd need to take many steps back and use a longer focal length, or sacrifice aperture. Even then I think the shoe would be distracting because it's right there front & centre. Anyway, I digress. Noise isn't a problem for me. Blurry face is. ISO 6400 on today's cameras is very definitely acceptable.
     
  9. ancient_mariner

    ancient_mariner

    Messages:
    9,538
    Name:
    Toni
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'm not a social photographer, so I've assumed the foot was the point of focus because you're trying to say something.

    As the guys say, noise isn't an issue, and can be part of the effect in an arty shot. Just assume if you use a lens with a large aperture wide open then depth of field will be wafer thin and therefore you need to focus on the most vital part of the image - that way the image appears in focus even when much of it is blurry.

    85mm f1.7 on FX:
    [​IMG]GospelBell--5 by Toni Ertl, on Flickr
     
  10. foggy4ever

    foggy4ever

    Messages:
    5,821
    Name:
    Storm Trooper
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'm no expert but some off camera flash could be very helpful. Have a look through the talk lighting and studio section for info.

    Also posting pics rather than links will get more responses, just copy the BBCode from flickr and paste directly into your post.

    [​IMG]Untitled by tilly gibbs, on Flickr
     
    Tilly112 likes this.
  11. scott199

    scott199

    Messages:
    746
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    That’s difficult, to get less noise (even thou it’s only really you that sees it, most dark photos have noise, but the main content draws the eyes elsewhere) you need to lower the iso, but as your shutter is all ready quite low, you maybe able to drop this again, or you have to open the aperture up, F1.8 or something.

    You would need to move away from the subject to open the DOF up, I couldn’t tell you if it’s possibke with that lens.

    To loose noise you have to get more light in the sensor, so you can lower the iso, either with a slower shutter, or larger Aperture.
     
  12. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    I will all of theses a try this and take my tripod along also so if I do have to slow the shutter I can reduce camera shake.
     
    scott199 likes this.
  13. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I’m happy with the picture however thank you for your feedback, I wanted to play around with different focus points and compositions, I do obviously have shots of his face this was just an example
     
  14. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes the shoe was the main focus, and overall what I was trying to accomplish I have I just didn’t feel it was overly clean and sharp (foot being the focus) so I was wondering what I could do but to improve these kinds shoots?

    I do have shots of his face that I will post later
     
  15. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    DSC_5152.jpg

    Here’s another one like it but as you can see I had lots of other light around me.. again I think the shot works well and I was happy with it
     
  16. TheBigYin

    TheBigYin Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,030
    Name:
    Mark
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    if this thread is slightly hard to follow, then it's because the OP cross-posted the same question to a number of forum areas and they've all been merged into one.

    OP, in future, please don't spam the forum with the same question - put it in one location, and if you don't get any answers, report the thread and ask if it'd be better placed somewhere else, and we'll move it for you.
     
  17. Phil V

    Phil V

    Messages:
    21,699
    Name:
    Phil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Much better*
    So, in this one the shoe is the ‘obvious’ focus point, because of the composition, lighting and because the face is more OoF...

    Which is what I said above. Interesting experiment to hone your composition and lighting skills though, because you’ve aimed for something ‘different ‘ you’ve found how easy it is to fail. If you’d have been shooting to emphasise the face, it’d have been more difficult to pinpoint composition and lighting errors that detract from the ‘subject’, because faces are so automatically appealing to us. The brighter light on the guys face draws our attention, but then slaps us back because it’s OoF, but the thing that’s in focus is the shoe, which is darker (hidden in the shadows).

    *i still wouldn’t describe it as a ‘portrait’, but I’m not sure how I would describe it; but I like it.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2018
    ancient_mariner and TheBigYin like this.
  18. Phil V

    Phil V

    Messages:
    21,699
    Name:
    Phil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    just to emphasise the importance of the above, in the first image posted, you had to tell us that the shoe was the point of focus, which seemed odd (it was barely noticeable) whereas the image of the girl works and the intent is obvious.

    Unfortunately for the photographer, our intent often overrides what we actually produced, so we know what we were shooting, but feel frustrated when others don’t ‘get it’.

    But it’s always our fault, we have to learn to see our own images objectively, or get help with editing from others. ‘Editing’ is as important a skill as the photography itself, picking what is worthy of showing isn’t easy, but the better you get at it, the more you avoid shooting stuff that doesn’t make the grade.

    Don’t confuse editing with post processing. And don’t fall into the hole of believing that PP can make up for what went wrong at the shooting stage.
     
    omens likes this.
  19. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Oh sorry I didn’t realise that happen
     
  20. soeren

    soeren

    Messages:
    1,105
    Name:
    Soeren
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    But whats so interesting bout his shoe? Your composition and distance renders his face adequately sharp that the viewer will be drawn to it. moving in closer getting rid of most of the uninteresting foreground and focussing on something that wll tell the story e.g. the wheel or other part of the scooter placed in the same plane as his foot rendering him more oof would probably result in a more interesting photo. On the second pic maybe you should have payed a bit more attention to the placement of the lights behind her head.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2018
    omens likes this.
  21. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Okay I understand what you are saying now that your drawn to his face due to his face being in the light yet my aim(not obvious) is his foot.. thank you for this feedback I feel it will help me on my photography road
     
    Phil V likes this.
  22. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I’m into my sneakers and the sneaker is a classic..
     
    soeren, foggy4ever and Bobsyeruncle like this.
  23. foggy4ever

    foggy4ever

    Messages:
    5,821
    Name:
    Storm Trooper
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Great shots BTW, it's easier to make a photographer out of an artist than an artist out of a photographer.
     
    TheBigYin and Phil V like this.
  24. soeren

    soeren

    Messages:
    1,105
    Name:
    Soeren
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    He he. Nerd :LOL:
     
  25. FlyPhot

    FlyPhot

    Messages:
    104
    Name:
    Jim
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    I like this one, for me i'd remove the two obvious white blobs top left (they are quite distracting) and possibly the white reflection on your glasses. In terms of the rest, I personally think it is OK, maybe it could be a bit more low key in the areas around you, but for me it's nothing major.
     
  26. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes I see the error of my ways with the white lights being distracting.. this was my first every shoot of people and in a public place but it’s all part of my learning iv only been taking pictures for about a year
     
    ancient_mariner likes this.
  27. Tilly112

    Tilly112

    Messages:
    51
    Name:
    Tilly
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    So I re did some of the shots I’m much happier although they don’t look very nice on my phone..

    DSC_1593.JPG

    DSC_1600.JPG
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice