How to focus on eyes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Crofts said:
It wasn't chosen by me - it was a picture that Joe chose from my blog to try to prove that it was out of focus. In fact, it's perfectly in focus. So it wasn't chosen by me. I posted it to show that even a random picture not selected by me, taken in the most difficult possible conditions, is still in focus.

I have hundreds of others that I could choose from...
Click to expand...

Then a simple solution would have been to say

"It's actually in focus but you can't tell because of the motion blur"
 
I find this whole thing pointless. A photo either works or it doesn't. Some photos look great when they are out of focus / blurry / grainy, some don't. Joe posted a photo, which to me, suffers as a result of "insert reason for softness". You don't think it matters, which is fine.

Can we all kiss and make up, it's late :)

Gary.
 
Maybe someone should have gone to specsavers
Click to expand...

Sorry, but this really is beginning to annoy me. There must be some actual photographers on this forum?
 
800 pixels. It was coming up massive.
Click to expand...

They're about 550 pixels each. One came up for a few seconds larger when I posted the wrong link, but I changed it within a few seconds.
 
OOPS teddys out of the cot.
 
Crofts said:
How do I go about getting my ID deleted from this forum?
Click to expand...

Look Simon, calm down. You've posted a shot clearly suffering from motion blur and are claiming it to be in perfect focus. You must understand why people are questioning your logic :shrug:
 
Simon, sleep on it - I'm sure you do have a valueable contribution to make to the forum. Come back tomorrow fresh!
 
Crofts said:
Sorry, but this really is beginning to annoy me. There must be some actual photographers on this forum?
Click to expand...

:lol: this is superb bedtime reading... i'm goosed after getting in from playing football in the rain and sleet... but i've certainly warmed up now.

my eyes have gone all blurred coz i'm reading it so fast!! :eek:
 
PPPffftttt ... Oh well, it doesn't seem that this is the place for a reasoned discussion.
 
awp said:
Simon, sleep on it - I'm sure you do have a valueable contribution to make to the forum. Come back tomorrow fresh!
Click to expand...

:agree: 100%... it really isn't a big deal mate. it's just healthy debate :thumbs:
 
You've posted a shot clearly suffering from motion blur and are claiming it to be in perfect focus.
Click to expand...

Yet again... (1) motion blur is different from focus. (2) it wasn't me that chose the photo :bang:

You want your account deleting because people are disagreeing with you?
Click to expand...

No, just bored with rudeness, and spending all night trying to explain what focus means. And on top of that I can't be bothered to repost posts that are being deleted. Throwing toys out of pram? **** off.

I can do other things more contructively with my time. Just delete my ID.
 
Crofts said:
Yet again... (1) motion blur is different from focus. (2) it wasn't me that chose the photo :bang:



No, just bored with rudeness, and spending all night trying to explain what focus means. And on top of that I can't be bothered to repost posts that are being deleted. Throwing toys out of pram? **** off.

I can do other things more contructively with my time. Just delete my ID.
Click to expand...

Crofts said:
You accuse me of arrogance?
Click to expand...

Indeed I do :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top