- Messages
- 1,508
- Name
- Clive
- Edit My Images
- No




Well madness has over come my boredomBought a Tamron 60-300mm that I don’t need for £22 inc adapter and postage![]()
....well I’m bored and it’s something new to play with.
To check the lens out quickly I’ll use a Fotga adapter (canon fD) on my nex 3….silly to waste a roll of film and hope it’s a VG copy.
More info on the lens:-
Something I would love to have... except I wouldn't, really. Weight is a real deal-killer for me! It would sit on the shelf and look at me sideways, saying, I'm wasted on you, and you wasted your money!I had been looking at a digital medium format outfit. However, when I saw the prices and realised that they aren't much bigger sensors than my full frame S1 I gave myself a good talking to and looked in the freeads for a film outfit. And here it is, a Pentax 645 at around a fifth of a digital outfit including a €5 tripod and a bag from the charity shop at the same price. The lens is a A 45-85 SMC and I have another A SMC on its way; A 80-160mm.
View attachment 476383
View attachment 476384
View attachment 476385
Not exactly travelling light, but at least my wallet isn't two grand lighter.
Something I would love to have... except I wouldn't, really. Weight is a real deal-killer for me! It would sit on the shelf and look at me sideways, saying, I'm wasted on you, and you wasted your money!


Unfortunately the separate mixing controller for the colour enlarger is missing - a shame but there I am. If one isn't available cheaply then it will give some good spares.I started working on cars this morning and on the edge of a drive across the street this lot had been left out for the scrap man...
View attachment 476933
A Phillips colour enlarger (power cables cut unfortunately) and base board minus the locking nut, a couple of enlarging easels, an "Ensign" branded made in Hong Kong tripod and a Prinz 1000w movie light!! Plus a fluorescent box that had been used as a light table.
Now the Prinz will never be used, the tripod is likely scrap but the easels will and if the enlarger doesn't work it will give up up various useful bits and it's Minolta 50mm lens. If the fluorescent stuff works I'll make a neg light box - I've been wanting one for ages.








DSC07645 by Kell, on Flickr
Minolta Dynax 7
View attachment 477408
A quite remarkable specification on this camera, original glass was a bit crusty so swapped it out for a 35-70 while I wait for some proper glass pop up.
I am impressed by the metering, which shows a 13 spot matrix of the scene with the difference from the average exposure indicated in each "cell" so you can adjust if desired.
Another feature that appeals to me is that the camera remembers all the exposure detail for the last 6 or 7 rolls of film, a real boon for testing out adjustments to ISO etc. to see what EI develops best.
Nice.
A word of warning if you're going to shoot the Type 517 with it though - make sure you cover the film window on the back of the camera! The cassettes for Type 517 can pipe light onto the film from the window, as I learned to my dismay when I shot a roll with my Nikon F80 recently.
See here: https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/ilford-517-light-leak.766635/
Minolta Dynax 7
View attachment 477408
A quite remarkable specification on this camera, original glass was a bit crusty so swapped it out for a 35-70 while I wait for some proper glass pop up.
I am impressed by the metering, which shows a 13 spot matrix of the scene with the difference from the average exposure indicated in each "cell" so you can adjust if desired.
Another feature that appeals to me is that the camera remembers all the exposure detail for the last 6 or 7 rolls of film, a real boon for testing out adjustments to ISO etc. to see what EI develops best.
I have hammered it today so will soon find out.Possibly worth saying, the 35-70 is a good lens (or should be).
Possibly worth saying, the 35-70 is a good lens (or should be).
A Fleabay purchase.
Sold as spares and repairs and untested. It was very dirty, dusty and had the usual Nikon sticky back and grip.
A bit of elbow grease, isopropyl alcohol and new batteries and it's good to go.
All for the princely sum of £20 delivered.
View attachment 479219
Well I have the F90x and there is alway an argument which is the better camera..I got mine at the bootie for about £10 and it had a pre AI 50mm lens on it which could have damage the mountI use my F80 a lot. It's a very capable camera, especially as you can utilise more modern F-Mount VR lenses to gain image stabilisation with it.
I had a F90x too. I found it a bit on the heavy side (said he who owns an F5Well I have the F90x and there is alway an argument which is the better camera..I got mine at the bootie for about £10 and it had a pre AI 50mm lens on it which could have damage the mount![]()
Well I have a few pre AI lenses e.g. 24 and 105 mm and would never have bought the Nikon F4 if the F90x could have taken them, same for only manual cameras..didn't fancy a Nikon F and use the FM........Nikon say "their cameras can use any Nikon lenses?" erm not sure about that as you have to open a small catch to mount pre AI lenses and not many cameras have this featureI have the F90x and the N90s as well, they are built like tanks with a reassuring heft to them. I find that the short tele's balance really well on a heavier body and help me get down to a 15th hand held, Goodness knows how the digital brigade go on with a camera the size of a packet of 20 fags and weighing less than a very small Roach.
I fully understand that there are weight weenies in most hobbies and I have never been able to decide who are the most seriously afflicted, cyclists or hikers.


Pretty sure I don't need any more lenses...
Last one for a bit (I hope).
Though the woman that sold it was getting rid of her late husband's Minolta kit and he also had about 4/5 Minolta 7000's in good nick...
Minolta MDIII 70-210/4
Minolta MDIII 70-210/4 by Kell, on Flickr
Minolta MDIII 70-210/4 by Kell, on Flickr