Well, I just upgraded and apart from the fact its not trashed my settings which came as a surprise I'd say its a bit better.
CAF test on 2.2 - Took 11, could use 8, would use 3 (was done in three small busts)
CAF test on 3.0 - Took 6, could use 3, would use 2 (just a single quicker walk)
Not scientific at all and my wee lad who I was getting to walk toward the camera was not pleased to be asked to do it again!
This was on the 75mm at 1.8 in my living room walking toward the window but for the 3.0 test the light dimmed (2.2 had 400/500 shutter and all ISO 200 - the 3.0 had 160/200 shutter with ISO at 320 to 400)
you ruled out EM10 then LOLMore. Testing. Please.
Basically I get my (small) bonus and possibly a promotion next month so I am treating myself but I am still struggling to chose between the 5mk2 (with grip) and the M1 - the M1 having much better C-AF would make the decision very easy...
Meant say what u gonna do with it. Oops sorry. What making u think of a upgrade??I already own an EM10...
I wonder what a psychiatrist/psychologist would make of this thread recently. riddled with doubt, angst, worry and tortured souls I just bought the EM-1 cos it looked really nice even nicer with the grip......................
Thats true enough, there was even feedback on the link posted earlier down in the comments.Don't put yourself out John, the interweb will be aflood with reviews soon enough.
Steady on, old chap, at this rate you'll be ordering a Voigtlander by Sunday nightGot the 25 1.4 yet Simon ?
Maybe...someone picked up a bargain elsewhere. Gutted I missed it
Got the 25 1.4 yet Simon ?
Hmmm where else do you look lol bet you won't say lol
Always want the best...wallet rules otherwise at timesHaha - Panny 20mm to the hard stuff in one weekend!
Argh my head hurts now..
I decided to go for the EM 1 then change mind to a EM10 then back to EM5. and then the Sony A6000
All this doing me nuts even though I have tried them all. It just I can't afford to be messing about..
Okay, its better - for me much better - granted they were gulls so slow moving with the exception of a dusk that flew by and none are good enough to put on flickr, but of 63 shots I had around 20 duffers, three of those in one burst where I missed focus completely.
That was on the 75mm so sure a very fast focusing lens but with a relatively shallow depth of field, locked in at 1/1600 - my basic method was simply CAF, 9 point selection, half shutter tracking and click.
I've uploaded a few here to a gallery which you can take a look at if you're interested (link)
I agree they are sharp images those.. Good lens too.. how far was the ISO on those since you had shutter at 1600Brilliant, thanks John
Those shots are super-sharp and well exposed in tricky conditions too, you've even managed to get the duck in focus!
Is it the one you don't use??Uh oh, someone has just noticed a new OMD - wonder how much I'd get for my RX100M3
Is it the one you don't use??
Or have you refound your passion?
Argh my head hurts now..
I decided to go for the EM 1 then change mind to a EM10 then back to EM5. and then the Sony A6000
All this doing me nuts even though I have tried them all. It just I can't afford to be messing about..
Okay, its better - for me much better - granted they were gulls so slow moving with the exception of a dusk that flew by and none are good enough to put on flickr, but of 63 shots I had around 20 duffers, three of those in one burst where I missed focus completely.
That was on the 75mm so sure a very fast focusing lens but with a relatively shallow depth of field, locked in at 1/1600 - my basic method was simply CAF, 9 point selection, half shutter tracking and click.
I've uploaded a few here to a gallery which you can take a look at if you're interested (link)