Thanks for all the help looks like I need to invest in a ff as well ?
Thanks for all the help looks like I need to invest in a ff as well ?
The 100 2.8 is a fab portrait lens.I do macro and wildlife Steven so I have the 7d2 a 100 2.8 300 2.8 and a 600f4
So is the 300/2.8... but not so much for indoorsThe 100 2.8 is a fab portrait lens.
I do macro and wildlife Steven so I have the 7d2 a 100 2.8 300 2.8 and a 600f4
Having a super shallow DOF is great when you really want/need it, but always being forced into it isn't. And it makes it much easier to misfocus... or rather, it makes it more apparent when you do; like in this example.I've just added a 85mm 1.4 to use on a D3 for my 1st granddaughter, fantastic combination.
Assuming you know where I focused which was on her lips. Also having 1.4 doesn't force you into using it all the time it's just an option to choose when and where the user sees fit.Having a super shallow DOF is great when you really want/need it, but always being forced into it isn't. And it makes it much easier to misfocus... or rather, it makes it more apparent when you do; like in this example.
I had assumed you meant to focus on her face... it's actually quite a bit in front.Assuming you know where I focused which was on her lips.
You're right. But most pick a fast aperture prime because they want to photograph indoors using only available light... and that's what forces you into it.Also having 1.4 doesn't force you into using it all the time it's just an option to choose when and where the user sees fit.
Just a touch in front, the problem focusing on such a small area but I'll have plenty of opportunities to experiment. I moved on a sigma 70-200 2.8 for a Nikon f4 version but missed shooting wider so an upcoming birthday and my first granddaughter due was enough of an excuse to get round the wife.I had assumed you meant to focus on her face... it's actually a bit in front.
You're right. But most pick a fast aperture prime because they want to photograph indoors using only available light... and that's what forces you into it.
Nice.Just a touch in front, the problem focusing on such a small area but I'll have plenty of opportunities to experiment. I moved on a sigma 70-200 2.8 for a Nikon f4 version but missed shooting wider so an upcoming birthday and my first granddaughter due was enough of an excuse to get round the wife.
I use 50 mm f2 on the Fuji and will get the Nikon 85mm S when it appears.
50mm on FF has also worked for me recently.
Now she is 2 and a half she will sometimes pose for about 1 second.
Bot?I use 50 mm f2 on the Fuji and will get the Nikon 85mm S when it appears.
50mm on FF has also worked for me recently.
Now she is 2 and a half she will sometimes pose for about 1 second.
Bot?
Are you copying my posts? See No. 15 above. I’m flattered.
Bot?
Looks like it. Just checked some other posts and they are exact copies of earlier ones in the same thread.
Not long enough IMHO.If you’ve got a crop body then 50mm is the way to go - similar focal length to 85mm but usually much cheaper.