- Messages
- 8,400
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- No
Apparently not. It should be a new one BUT it's just a rumour from Sonyrumours.This is that camera.
Apparently not. It should be a new one BUT it's just a rumour from Sonyrumours.This is that camera.
Oh dear Sony still proving schizophrenic over their lenses, infact I'm gonna apply for a job there as they must take on anyone.
Wowzer!!!
I have just seen the prices! My jaw is welded to the floor. Jeepers!!! In fact I find it almost insulting to think that we are going to have to pay that sort of money if we want one of their lenses.
Apparently not. It should be a new one BUT it's just a rumour from Sonyrumours.
LOL...Bad timing!!Andy is that why your gear is in the classifieds or another reason mate?
£1800 for a 24-70 and £1500 for the 85. Ouch.
Agreed. Seems like they are holding back a little..
What lenses are you talking about? If it's the new G lenses they are FF.Crazy lens prices, I would want full frame glass for that kind of money, its performance still can't touch a Nikon D810 + 24-70 but you want me a to pay a lot more. Jog on I think .. Disappointing as I have been getting on well with my 6000 which I use as a back up camera.
They've been holding back touchscreen for a loooooooooooooooong time now.
I'd probably ditch my Micro 4/3rds system if they sorted it.
I'm not sure I've ever used 1/8000 on any of my cameras (or very rarely). But then, bright midday sun is not particularly flattering for portraits.Disappointing to see that the A6300 has a max mechanical shutter speed of 1/4000.
I'm not sure I've ever used 1/8000 on any of my cameras (or very rarely). But then, bright midday sun is not particularly flattering for portraits.
The A6300 looks amazing mostly for the autofocus system. I just wish they'd produce some more suitable E-mount lenses. 24/1.4 OSS anyone?
If you're an f8 and be there kind of guy it's not an issue. And no, I wouldn't normally shoot a portrait at f1.4 to f2.8 but I often point my camera at other things and at other distances than tight head and shoulder portrait distance.I'm not sure I've ever used 1/8000 on any of my cameras (or very rarely). But then, bright midday sun is not particularly flattering for portraits.
This guy mentions the two...Any chance the X-PRO2 using the same sensor in the Sony A6300? Both using copper wiring and both have the same expandable ISO range at the top end.
Any chance the X-PRO2 using the same sensor in the Sony A6300? Both using copper wiring and both have the same expandable ISO range at the top end.
Oh dear... why on earth do people feel the need to do this?Maybe it is, although it's a one trick Af pony in the Sony and a fully fledged extremely ergonomic system in the Fuji.
Pay your money take your choice.
I'm sure there are many reasons to choose one over the other.
What lenses are you talking about? If it's the new G lenses they are FF.
Just noticed that they haven't put IBIS in this camera, I wonder if this would have affected the camera size?
Next week and the week afterWhat happened to the A6100 and A6200 ?
Does anyone reckon the price of the 70-200mm f4 will come down in price? Would love this lens but for my needs it's too much money to justify it
the 24-70 is the only one thats lighter than dslr, but its bigger and 82mm thread
70200 is similer size and weight to dslr ones, 85mm even heavier than some dslr ones
but sony only cares about fe, rx and then apsc e mount
they seemingly dont give a s*** about a mount :|
Wasn't the A6000 the best selling CSC? And I assume most people just buy the camera and kit lens bundle? And A series sales are I gather tiny?
I do know that lack of kit is annoying but us geeks are a relatively small market and despite what we think I'm pretty sure that Sony know better than us what makes them money.
Sad realities I'm affraid.
Wasn't the A6000 the best selling CSC? And I assume most people just buy the camera and kit lens bundle? And A series sales are I gather tiny?
I do know that lack of kit is annoying but us geeks are a relatively small market and despite what we think I'm pretty sure that Sony know better than us what makes them money.
Sad realities I'm affraid.
they have done so very little with a mount for years and don't advertise it, so no surprise the sales aren't there.
the rx series and qx where done because the head guy wanted them, just him. So he could of pulled resources from a mount stuff when it was still doing ok.
and e mount is better if u want slow kit lens on crop body, but not a wide selection of fast glass on crop.
fe gets all the love, but if they made equal spec a mount stuff in ff....